Sign in or create a free account to continue.

ACCT-212 · Lesson 6 of 12 · 28 min

Leases II: remeasurement, sale-and-leaseback and lessors

Lesson 5 measured a simple lease at commencement and followed it to the end. Leases in practice change: rents rise with inflation, tenants extend or shrink their space, companies sell buildings and lease them back, and many companies are lessors as well as lessees. This lesson covers remeasurement and modifications of lessee leases, sale-and-leaseback transactions, subleases and the lessor's side, which both boards largely carried forward from the earlier standards. Northlake provides the examples: its warehouse lease is indexed to inflation, it sells and leases back its head office, and it leases monitoring stations to municipalities that prefer not to buy them.

Remeasuring the lease liability

After commencement, the lessee remeasures the lease liability when the lease payments change. The remeasurement is recognized as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset (or in profit or loss if the asset has been reduced to zero). The rate used depends on why the payments changed. If the change results from a reassessment of the lease term, of a purchase option or of a floating interest rate, the liability is remeasured using a revised discount rate at the reassessment date. If the change results from an index or rate, such as the consumer price index, or from a change in amounts expected under a residual value guarantee, the original discount rate is kept.

IFRS 16 requires the lessee to remeasure the liability whenever a change in an index or rate changes the cash flows, that is, when the adjustment to lease payments takes effect.

Worked problem

An inflation-indexed rent

Northlake's warehouse lease from lesson 5 provides that, from year 3, rent is adjusted for the change in the consumer price index since commencement. At the start of year 3 the index has risen 3 per cent, so the remaining three payments become $206,000. The carrying amount of the liability at that date is $534,602. What happens?

Show solution
  1. The change in payments results from an index, so the original 6 per cent rate is kept.
  2. Revised liability: 206,000 × [1 − 1.06⁻³] ÷ 0.06 = $550,640.
  3. Increase: 550,640 − 534,602 = $16,038, debited to the right-of-use asset and credited to the lease liability.
  4. Future depreciation and interest are based on the revised amounts.

Answer: Liability and right-of-use asset both rise by $16,038.

Lease modifications

A lease modification is a change in the scope of a lease or its consideration that was not part of the original terms, such as adding or removing space, extending or shortening the term, or changing the rent. A modification is accounted for as a separate new lease if it increases the scope by adding the right to use one or more underlying assets and the consideration increases by an amount commensurate with the standalone price for that added scope. Otherwise, the lessee remeasures the existing lease liability using a revised discount rate at the modification date. For a modification that decreases scope, such as giving up a floor of a building, the lessee first reduces the right-of-use asset proportionately and recognizes a gain or loss, then adjusts for the remaining change in the liability.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, both boards offered temporary relief so that lessees did not have to assess whether rent concessions were modifications. That relief has expired, but the episode showed how often lease terms change in practice and how much work remeasurements require. Many companies now use lease accounting software that tracks each lease's payments, options and index provisions.

Sale-and-leaseback transactions

In a sale-and-leaseback, a company sells an asset, often real estate, and leases it back from the buyer. The seller-lessee raises cash while keeping the use of the asset. The first question in both frameworks is whether the transfer is a sale under the revenue standard (IFRS 15 or ASC 606): has control of the asset passed to the buyer-lessor? A leaseback alone does not prevent sale treatment, but a repurchase option at anything other than fair value usually does. If the transfer is not a sale, the seller keeps the asset on its books and treats the cash as a financial liability.

If the transfer is a sale, IFRS 16 requires the seller-lessee to measure the right-of-use asset as the proportion of the previous carrying amount of the asset that relates to the right of use it keeps, and to recognize only the gain that relates to the rights transferred to the buyer-lessor. A 2022 amendment, effective in 2024, specifies how to measure the leaseback liability when payments are variable, so that no gain is recognized on the right of use retained.

Worked problem

Selling and leasing back the head office

Northlake sells its head office, carrying amount $4 million, for its fair value of $6 million and leases it back for ten years. The present value of the leaseback payments is $2.4 million. The transfer qualifies as a sale. What is recognized?

Show solution
  1. Proportion of the building's value retained through the leaseback: 2.4 ÷ 6.0 = 40 per cent.
  2. Right-of-use asset: 40 per cent of the $4 million carrying amount = $1.6 million.
  3. Total gain on the building: 6.0 − 4.0 = $2.0 million. Gain on rights transferred: 2.0 × (6.0 − 2.4) ÷ 6.0 = $1.2 million.
  4. Entry: debit cash $6.0 million and right-of-use asset $1.6 million; credit building $4.0 million, lease liability $2.4 million and gain $1.2 million.

Answer: Gain of $1.2 million and a right-of-use asset of $1.6 million.

Lessor accounting

Both boards decided that lessor accounting under the old standards worked well enough, so IFRS 16 and ASC 842 largely carried it forward. A lessor classifies each lease at inception. Under IFRS 16, a lease is a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the underlying asset; otherwise it is an operating lease. Indicators include transfer of ownership, a bargain purchase option, a lease term for the major part of the asset's economic life, a present value of payments amounting to substantially all of its fair value, and specialized assets.

For a finance (or sales-type) lease, the lessor derecognizes the underlying asset and recognizes a net investment in the lease, the present value of lease payments receivable plus any unguaranteed residual value. A manufacturer or dealer lessor, such as Northlake leasing its own stations, recognizes revenue at the lower of the asset's fair value and the present value of lease payments, cost of sales equal to the carrying amount less the present value of any unguaranteed residual, and therefore selling profit at commencement. Interest income is then recognized over the lease term on the net investment using the rate implicit in the lease. For an operating lease, the lessor keeps the asset, depreciates it and recognizes lease income on a straight-line basis.

Worked problem

Northlake as a manufacturer lessor

A city leases a monitoring station from Northlake for its five-year economic life, paying $30,000 at the end of each year. The rate implicit in the lease is 7 per cent; the station cost Northlake $90,000 to build. There is no residual value. How does Northlake account for the lease?

Show solution
  1. The lease covers the whole economic life, so it is a finance (sales-type) lease.
  2. Present value of payments: 30,000 × [1 − 1.07⁻⁵] ÷ 0.07 = $123,006, equal to the fair value.
  3. At commencement: revenue $123,006; cost of sales $90,000; selling profit $33,006. Debit net investment in the lease $123,006; credit revenue. Debit cost of sales; credit inventory $90,000.
  4. Year 1 interest income: 123,006 × 7% = $8,610. The first payment reduces the net investment by 30,000 − 8,610 = $21,390.

Answer: Selling profit of $33,006 at commencement, then interest income on the net investment over five years.

# Net investment in a sales-type (finance) lease: five payments of 30,000 at 7%
payment, rate, years = 30_000, 0.07, 5
net_inv = sum(payment / (1 + rate) ** t for t in range(1, years + 1))
cost = 90_000
print(f"Revenue {net_inv:,.0f}; cost of sales {cost:,}; selling profit {net_inv - cost:,.0f}")
print(f"{'Year':>4} {'Payment':>8} {'Interest':>9} {'Principal':>10} {'Net investment':>15}")
total_interest = 0
for y in range(1, years + 1):
    interest = net_inv * rate
    principal = payment - interest
    net_inv -= principal
    total_interest += interest
    print(f"{y:>4} {payment:>8,} {interest:>9,.0f} {principal:>10,.0f} {max(net_inv, 0):>15,.0f}")
print(f"Total interest income {total_interest:,.0f}; total profit {total_interest + 123_006 - cost:,.0f}")
Output
Revenue 123,006; cost of sales 90,000; selling profit 33,006
Year  Payment  Interest  Principal  Net investment
   1   30,000     8,610     21,390         101,616
   2   30,000     7,113     22,887          78,729
   3   30,000     5,511     24,489          54,241
   4   30,000     3,797     26,203          28,037
   5   30,000     1,963     28,037               0
Total interest income 26,994; total profit 60,000

Over the lease, Northlake earns $26,994 of interest income on top of the $33,006 selling profit, for total income of $60,000: the $150,000 of payments less the $90,000 cost. If the city had instead signed a two-year lease of the same station, the lease would be an operating lease: Northlake would keep the station in property, plant and equipment, depreciate it and recognize rental income straight-line.

Diagram of a manufacturer lessor. At commencement the station leaves inventory and becomes a net investment in the lease, with revenue and cost of sales giving selling profit. Over five years, payments from the city reduce the net investment, and interest income is recognized each year.
A manufacturer lessor earns selling profit up front and interest over the term.

Subleases and intermediate lessors

When a lessee subleases an asset to a third party, it becomes an intermediate lessor. Under IFRS 16 it classifies the sublease by reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head lease, not the underlying asset. A sublease of an entire building for most of the remaining head lease term is therefore often a finance sublease: the intermediate lessor derecognizes the right-of-use asset, recognizes a net investment in the sublease and keeps the head lease liability.

Disclosure and analysis

Lessees disclose the carrying amounts of right-of-use assets by class, depreciation, interest on lease liabilities, short-term and variable lease expense, total cash outflows for leases, additions, and a maturity analysis of lease liabilities. Lessors disclose selling profit, finance income on the net investment, operating lease income and a maturity analysis of payments receivable. Because lease liabilities are often among a company's largest obligations, these disclosures repay careful reading: a retailer's store leases, an airline's aircraft leases and a telecom company's tower leases can rival its bonded debt.

Further lease differences between the frameworks.
TopicIFRS 16ASC 842 (for comparison)
Index-based rent increasesRemeasure the liability when payments changeVariable cost when incurred
Sale-and-leaseback gainOnly on rights transferredFull gain if sale and operating leaseback
Lessor classificationFinance or operatingSales-type, direct financing or operating
Sublease classificationBy reference to the right-of-use assetBy reference to the underlying asset

Common mistakes

  • MistakeIgnoring a CPI rent increase until the end of the lease.

    InsteadUnder IFRS 16, remeasure the liability with the original rate when indexed payments change.

  • MistakeTreating every sale-and-leaseback as a sale.

    InsteadFirst test whether control transfers under the revenue standard; otherwise it is a financing.

  • MistakeRecognizing the full gain on a sale-and-leaseback under IFRS 16.

    InsteadRecognize only the gain on rights transferred to the buyer-lessor.

  • MistakeRecognizing all lease payments received as revenue in a sales-type lease.

    InsteadRecognize selling profit at commencement and interest income over the term; payments reduce the net investment.

  • MistakeUsing the original discount rate after a lease term reassessment.

    InsteadA change in lease term or purchase option uses a revised discount rate.

Summary and key terms

  • Lease liabilities are remeasured when payments change, with the asset adjusted.
  • Index-based changes keep the original discount rate; changes in term or options use a revised rate.
  • IFRS 16 remeasures for index changes when payments change.
  • Modifications that add scope at a standalone price are separate leases; others are remeasured.
  • Sale-and-leaseback gains are limited to the rights transferred.
  • Lessors classify leases at inception; finance or sales-type leases replace the asset with a net investment.
  • Manufacturer lessors recognize selling profit at commencement and interest over the term.
Finance lease (lessor)
A lease that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.
Remeasurement
Updating the lease liability for changed payments, with a matching adjustment to the right-of-use asset.
Lease modification
A change in the scope or consideration of a lease that was not part of its original terms.
Sale-and-leaseback
A transaction in which an entity sells an asset and leases it back from the buyer.
Net investment in the lease
The present value of lease payments receivable plus any unguaranteed residual value.
Selling profit
Revenue less cost of sales recognized by a manufacturer or dealer lessor at commencement.
Unguaranteed residual value
The portion of the asset's residual value whose realization by the lessor is not assured.
Intermediate lessor
A lessee that subleases the underlying asset to a third party.
Rate implicit in the lease
The rate that discounts lease payments and unguaranteed residual value to the asset's fair value plus the lessor's initial direct costs.

Practice problems

Work each problem on paper first, then reveal the answer to check.

  1. Remaining payments rise from $50,000 to $52,000 for 4 years because of CPI; rate 5 per cent. Increase in liability (IFRS 16)?

    Show answer

    2,000 × 3.5460 = $7,092.

  2. Why is the original rate kept for index-based changes?

    Show answer

    The change reflects the existing pricing mechanism, not a new financing decision.

  3. A tenant adds a floor at its market rent for the remaining term. Accounting?

    Show answer

    A separate new lease.

  4. Asset carrying amount $1 million, sold at fair value $1.5 million; leaseback PV $600,000. IFRS right-of-use asset and gain?

    Show answer

    ROU $400,000; gain 0.5 × 0.9/1.5 = $300,000.

  5. Same facts under US GAAP with an operating leaseback?

    Show answer

    Gain $500,000; ROU $600,000.

  6. Lease payments PV $80,000; equipment cost $60,000; manufacturer lessor. Selling profit?

    Show answer

    $20,000.

  7. Rerun the lessor program with a 6 per cent implicit rate. What changes?

    Show answer

    Revenue rises to about $126,371 and total interest falls; total profit stays $60,000.

  8. A lessor's lease covers 40 per cent of the asset's life and 50 per cent of its fair value. Classification?

    Show answer

    Operating lease: the lessor depreciates the asset and recognizes straight-line income.

  9. How is a sublease classified under IFRS 16?

    Show answer

    By reference to the right-of-use asset from the head lease.

  10. A seller-lessee has an option to repurchase the asset at a fixed price. Sale?

    Show answer

    Usually not; the buyer has not obtained control, so it is a financing.

Lesson quiz · 5 questions

Score 60% or more to complete this lesson.

Take the quiz