Capstone: reviewing the Pelletier and Beaudry files

For the last class, Desjardins hands each student a binder with the two complete files: the missing person report, the investigation notes and the court documents in the Pelletier case, and the arrest report, bail documents, Gladue report and sentencing transcript in the Beaudry case. Sergeant Haddad, Sergeant Keeshig and Elder Shawanda join the class. The task is the one officers perform in a formal case review: build an accurate timeline, identify what went well and what went wrong, find the root causes rather than only the symptoms, and recommend practical changes, each with someone responsible for it.

Desjardins sets out the rules for the review. It is about systems and decisions, not about blaming individuals; the officer at the counter and the officer who made the arrest are both treated as people who did their best with the habits and guidance they had. Every finding must be supported by the record. And the review must ask what the families and the community would say, not only what the service thinks. 'If Danielle Pelletier and Kyle's grandmother read your review,' he says, 'would they recognize what happened to them?'

The Pelletier file: timeline

Linh Tran and Priya Sandhu build the timeline of the missing person case from the notes. Tara was last seen at home at about 20:00 on Thursday, February 5, after an argument in which Coulter choked her against the hallway wall. She bought a bus ticket at 23:52 and left at 00:10. Danielle tried to reach her all day Friday and came to the station at 14:10 on Saturday. The report was taken and the family was told to wait until Monday. Danielle stayed and added the facts that showed risk, and at 14:50 the case was classified high risk. From there, the timeline shows a lead investigator at 15:05, database entry at 15:10, the call to Nimkii Bay at 15:20, a family liaison at 15:30, the phone request at 16:10 and the bus terminal video at 18:15. The public appeal went out on Sunday morning, Tara was confirmed safe at 11:20 on Monday and Coulter was arrested on Tuesday.

What went well and what went wrong

The class finds much that went well. Once the risk was recognized, the response was fast and complete: every basic step was taken within about eighty minutes. The urgent demand under the Missing Persons Act produced the key lead within hours. The partnership with the Nimkii Bay police worked because the two sergeants knew each other. The family had one contact who kept them informed, and cultural support was offered and accepted. The officers at Coulter's door recorded exactly what they saw and heard without confrontation. The approach to shelters protected Tara's safety and privacy. And when Tara was found, police respected her choices.

The class also finds what went wrong. The forty minutes at the counter were the most visible failure, and only Danielle's persistence prevented a delay of up to two days. Desjardins asks the students to look further back. Why did Danielle wait 42 hours before coming in? The notes from Morin record the answer: Danielle had heard from relatives that police in the city did not take Indigenous women seriously, and she was afraid of being told to wait, which is exactly what happened. Marco DiSanto points out that the first officers who spoke to Coulter could not have known about the bus video, but that nothing in the file shows anyone asked Coulter for Tara's phone and bank card, which he controlled; the review recommends adding financial and technological control to the risk questions.

The Beaudry file

Jesse Morningstar and Amara Okafor lead the review of the Beaudry file. They find that the arrest was lawful and well handled: Okeke and Reyes separated the parties, got the injured man to hospital, recorded the evidence that Hale had shoved Kyle first and noted Kyle's cooperation and his concern for his grandmother. The decision to hold Kyle for a bail hearing was within the law, but the reasons recorded, an address in Nimkii Bay and two old youth breaches, were weak, and section 493.2 was not mentioned. The bail conditions included a total ban on alcohol, which Kyle had told the duty counsel he could not keep without treatment; he was lucky not to breach it before his plea. The Gladue report was thorough, and the conditional sentence connected him with his family, the healing program and treatment.

Amara raises the victim's perspective. Trevor Hale's statement described three weeks off work, numbness in his face, fear of going out at night and anger that nobody had told him about the plea until the day before. The class agrees that the victim's experience was the weakest part of the file: the officers had treated him well at the scene, but no one had kept him informed afterwards. The Victim/Witness Assistance Program had a contact for him but had used it only twice. Elder Shawanda says that in her community's way of thinking, a response that helps Kyle but leaves Hale angry and forgotten has not finished its work. The review recommends that officers make sure every victim of violence is referred to victim services and knows who to call, and that the service check that referrals lead to contact.

Scoring the response

Desjardins asks the class to score both files using a simple rubric that the service uses in case reviews: ten areas, each scored 0 for poor, 1 for partly met and 2 for fully met. The areas are risk recognition, speed of response, investigation, partnership with the community's police, family or victim communication, cultural support, respect for rights and privacy, accuracy of records, fairness of release decisions and use of community options. The scores are meant to start a discussion, not to grade anyone.

What the families said

Haddad shares what the two families said when the service asked them, as part of the real review, what they would want officers to learn. Danielle Pelletier said: 'Believe us the first time. We know our sisters.' Kyle's grandmother, Ruth Beaudry, said: 'He did something wrong and he knew it. What helped was that nobody treated him like he was nothing.' Trevor Hale, asked the same question, said: 'Call me back.' Desjardins writes the three sentences on the board and leaves them there for the rest of the class.

What the course has been about

Desjardins closes the course by returning to the six principles from Lesson 1: respect for self-determination, history that explains the present, knowledge of the law, taking every report seriously, relationships before crises, and cultural humility. Each of them appeared in the two files. Self-determination meant working with the Nimkii Bay police service and the community's healing program as partners. History explained Danielle's 42-hour delay and Kyle's family's experience with institutions. Knowing the law meant knowing the Missing Persons Act, section 493.2 and Gladue. Taking reports seriously was what the counter failed to do and the sergeant did. Relationships before crises were what made the call between Haddad and Keeshig work. And cultural humility was asking Danielle what support she wanted rather than deciding for her.

Keeshig speaks last. He tells the students that most of them will never work in a First Nations community, but every one of them will meet Indigenous people on calls, as victims, witnesses, suspects, colleagues and neighbours. 'You'll forget the case names,' he says. 'Try not to forget the knock on the door, the forty minutes at the counter and the grandmother in the hallway. If you remember those, you'll figure out the rest.' Elder Shawanda then asks the students to stand, and she offers a few words in Anishinaabemowin, which she translates afterwards: she wishes them a good path, and asks them to walk it in a good way.

Following up and reporting back

A review is only useful if its recommendations are carried out. Desjardins asks the class how the service will know, a year from now, whether the changes worked. The students propose measures for each recommendation: the time from every missing person report to a supervisor's risk review, the share of reports with identity recorded, the number of victims of violence who confirm they were contacted by victim services, and a repeat of the community survey. They agree that the results should be reported, in plain language, to the Indigenous advisory circle and to the Nimkii Bay community, not only to the chief. Haddad says the service has agreed to do exactly that, and to return to the Nimkii Bay hall in a year to report.

Elder Shawanda says that this is the part of the review her community cares about most. 'People have heard a lot of promises,' she says. 'What they want is for you to come back and tell them what you did, and what you didn't do, and why. If you do that, even when the news isn't good, they'll start to believe you.'

Amara Okafor adds that the two files show something the statistics in Lesson 7 cannot: how a single decision feels to the people on the other side of it. A family told to wait, a young man held because his address was on a reserve, a victim who heard nothing for months. 'None of it was dramatic,' she says. 'That's what scares me. It's all stuff I could do on an ordinary Tuesday without noticing.' Desjardins tells her that noticing is the point of the course.