LES-114 · Lesson 8 of 12 · 19 min
Mental health law and apprehension under the Mental Health Act
▶ Video coming soon A video version of this lesson is on the way.
By 22:40 on Calder Street, Adam was calmer, but his situation had not changed. He had not slept properly in five days, had eaten almost nothing, still believed the lights were watching him and said that he would 'deal with' the neighbour if the watching did not stop. Morales asked whether he would come to the hospital to talk to a doctor about sleep and the cameras. He said no. His sister Claire, on speakerphone, asked him to go. He said no again, quietly. Kaplan now had a legal decision to make, and Desjardins tells the class that this is the moment where knowing the law exactly matters most.
Voluntary first
The Mental Health Act of Ontario is built on the principle that people should receive care voluntarily wherever possible. Most people admitted to psychiatric units in Ontario are informal or voluntary patients, who came on their own or agreed to admission. A person who agrees to go to hospital with officers, as Maya did in lesson 7, is not apprehended; they are being helped. The Act's powers to take a person to hospital against their will are exceptions, with strict tests, because detaining a person who has committed no offence is one of the most serious things the state can do. Other provinces have their own mental health acts with similar structures but different wording, such as section 28 of British Columbia's Act and section 12 of Alberta's.
Three routes to an assessment
Ontario's Act provides three main routes for bringing a person to a hospital for a psychiatric assessment against their will. Under section 15, a physician who has examined the person within the past seven days can sign an application for psychiatric assessment, known as a Form 1, if the legal criteria are met. A Form 1 authorizes police to take the person to a psychiatric facility, and authorizes the facility to detain the person for up to 72 hours for assessment. Under section 16, any person, often a family member, can go before a justice of the peace and give information under oath; if the justice is satisfied that the criteria are met, they can issue an order for examination, known as a Form 2, which authorizes police to take the person to a physician. A Form 2 is valid for seven days. Under section 17, a police officer can act directly, without any form, when the officer's own observations and information meet the test and it would be dangerous to wait for the section 16 process.
The section 17 test
Section 17 has several parts, and Desjardins insists that officers be able to state each one in their notes. First, the officer must have reasonable grounds to believe that the person is acting or has acted in a disorderly manner. Second, the officer must have reasonable cause to believe that the person has threatened or attempted, or is threatening or attempting, to cause bodily harm to themselves; or has behaved or is behaving violently toward another person, or has caused or is causing another person to fear bodily harm from them; or has shown or is showing a lack of competence to care for themselves. Third, the officer must be of the opinion that the person is apparently suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or quality that will likely result in serious bodily harm to the person or another, or in serious physical impairment of the person. Fourth, it must be dangerous to proceed under section 16. If all parts are met, the officer may take the person into custody to an appropriate place for examination by a physician.
Kaplan walks the class through her reasoning on Calder Street. Disorderly manner: Adam had smashed the hallway light and had been shouting and banging for an hour. Violence or fear: he had damaged property while shouting and had told Mrs. Halverson, through her door, that he would make the watchers stop, which caused her to fear for her safety. Apparent mental disorder likely to result in serious harm: he had a known diagnosis of psychosis, was not taking treatment, had fixed beliefs that his neighbour was watching him, had said he would deal with her, and had not slept or eaten for days, so there was a real risk of serious harm to her and of serious physical impairment to him. Dangerous to proceed under section 16: a Form 2 would take hours, and leaving Adam alone that night with those beliefs, next door to the woman he blamed, was not safe. Morales, as a clinician, agreed with the assessment. Desjardins notes that her agreement helped but did not replace Kaplan's own judgment, because the legal power belonged to the officer.
Desjardins stresses what the test does not allow. A diagnosis alone is not enough. Odd behaviour, being homeless or refusing treatment are not enough. A family member's wish that the person go to hospital is not enough. An officer who uses the power simply because it is late and the person is difficult is acting unlawfully. Courts have treated a mental health apprehension as a detention under the Charter, so section 9 protects against arbitrary detention, the person must be told promptly why they are being taken, and they have the right to retain and instruct counsel, though they may not be able to exercise it until they reach hospital.
Carrying out the apprehension
Kaplan explained her decision to Adam before acting. 'Adam, I'm worried about you and about your neighbour. You haven't slept in days and you're frightened. I'm going to take you to the hospital tonight to see a doctor. This isn't an arrest, and you haven't been charged with anything. You have the right to talk to a lawyer, and I'll help you do that when we get there.' She asked whether he wanted to bring his jacket and his phone, and whether he wanted Claire to meet them there. He was upset, but he put on his jacket.
Port Ardent policy allows officers to transport a person taken under mental health law without handcuffs when an assessment shows it is safe, and requires officers to record their reasons either way. Kaplan judged that Adam was calm and cooperative, conducted a pat-down search for safety with his agreement, explaining each step before she did it, and transported him in the back of the co-response car with Morales following. Desjardins tells the class that handcuffs on a person who has committed no crime and is cooperating can feel deeply humiliating and can damage trust for years, but that officers must also protect themselves and the person. The decision should be made thoughtfully, not by habit.
At the hospital: section 33 and the transfer of custody
Under section 33 of the Act, an officer who takes a person to a psychiatric facility must remain there and keep the person in custody until the facility takes custody of them. In practice, that has often meant officers waiting for hours in emergency departments. Ontario's Police-Hospital Transition Framework, developed by health and justice partners, encourages hospitals and police to agree on a quick, safe handover, with a target of transferring custody within about half an hour of arrival where possible. Many hospitals have since adopted transfer protocols, though waits remain long in some places.
Kaplan and Adam arrived at Port Ardent General at 23:05. A triage nurse saw him within ten minutes, but the emergency physician did not accept custody until 01:40, two hours and 35 minutes later. Kaplan and Morales stayed with him the whole time. Claire arrived at midnight. Morales says the wait was not wasted: Adam talked with his sister and became calmer, and the doctor who saw him at 01:40 knew a great deal about him from Morales's notes.
Port Ardent hospital waits
Waiting at hospital is one of the largest costs of mental health calls. The program below summarizes the time from arrival at hospital to the hospital accepting the person, for Port Ardent's mental health transports in 2025.
# Minutes from arrival at hospital to handover, Port Ardent mental health transports, 2025
# (minutes rounded up to the group's upper limit, number of transports)
groups = [(30, 41), (60, 73), (120, 118), (180, 96), (240, 52), (360, 31), (480, 9)]
n = sum(c for m, c in groups)
cum = 0
for limit, count in groups:
cum += count
print(f"within {limit:3} minutes: {cum:3} of {n} ({cum / n:.2f})")
officer_hours = sum(limit * count for limit, count in groups) / 60 * 2 # two officers each
print("upper estimate of officer-hours spent waiting:", round(officer_hours))within 30 minutes: 41 of 420 (0.10) within 60 minutes: 114 of 420 (0.27) within 120 minutes: 232 of 420 (0.55) within 180 minutes: 328 of 420 (0.78) within 240 minutes: 380 of 420 (0.90) within 360 minutes: 411 of 420 (0.98) within 480 minutes: 420 of 420 (1.00) upper estimate of officer-hours spent waiting: 2167
Only about one transport in ten was handed over within half an hour, and about one in four within an hour. Almost half waited more than two hours. Desjardins says that hospitals face real pressures, including crowded emergency departments and a shortage of psychiatric beds, and that the solution is a shared protocol, not blame. Port Ardent and the hospital signed a new transfer agreement in January 2026, and the course will look at its early results in lesson 10.
Other powers and duties
Ontario's Act also allows a physician to issue a community treatment order, which lets a person with a history of repeated admissions live in the community on a treatment plan. If the person does not comply, the physician can issue an order for examination, known as a Form 47, which authorizes police to bring the person for examination. Officers should also know that a person taken under the Act keeps their rights at hospital, including the right to be told why they are being held, to contact a lawyer and, if they become an involuntary patient, to apply to the Consent and Capacity Board.
Worked problem
Applying section 17
At 14:00, officers find a man sitting on a sidewalk in light rain, talking to himself. He is homeless, is known to have schizophrenia and refuses to go to a shelter or hospital. He has food in his bag, a coat on and has not threatened anyone. A store manager wants him removed. Can the officers take him to hospital against his will?
Show solution
- Check each part of section 17: there is no disorderly conduct of the required kind, no threat or attempt of bodily harm, no violence or fear caused, and no sign he cannot care for himself; he has food and a coat.
- A diagnosis, homelessness and refusing services are not enough to meet the test.
- Look for other options: offer outreach, a shelter, food or a call to the street outreach team or co-response team, and explain to the manager what the law allows.
- If he is trespassing on private property, deal with that under the relevant law, using the least intrusive approach.
- Record the observations and the reasons for the decision.
Answer: No. The legal test is not met, so the officers cannot take him to hospital against his will. They should offer support and deal with any separate issue in the least intrusive way.
Common mistakes
MistakeA diagnosis of mental illness allows officers to take a person to hospital.
InsteadThe legal test requires specific grounds about behaviour and risk, not just a diagnosis.
MistakeIf family want the person in hospital, officers can take them.
InsteadFamily can seek a Form 2 from a justice of the peace; officers act under section 17 only if their own grounds meet the test.
MistakeOnce at hospital, officers can leave.
InsteadUnder section 33, officers must remain until the facility takes custody.
MistakeHandcuffs are always required for transport.
InsteadPolicy may allow transport without handcuffs after an assessment; record the reasons either way.
Summary and key terms
- Voluntary care comes first; involuntary powers are exceptions with strict tests.
- Ontario routes: Form 1 by a physician (section 15), Form 2 by a justice of the peace (section 16) and police action (section 17).
- Section 17 requires disorderly conduct, a specified kind of harm or incapacity, an apparent mental disorder likely to cause serious harm, and danger in waiting for section 16.
- The apprehension is a detention under the Charter: give reasons and advise of the right to counsel.
- Under section 33, officers remain until the facility accepts custody; transfer protocols aim to shorten waits.
- Record every element of the legal test in notes and reports.
- Form 1
- An application for psychiatric assessment signed by a physician, allowing detention for up to 72 hours.
- Form 2
- An order for examination issued by a justice of the peace, valid for seven days.
- Section 17
- The Mental Health Act power allowing a police officer to take a person for examination.
- Section 33
- The duty of an officer to remain at the facility until it takes custody.
- Community treatment order
- An order allowing a person to live in the community on a treatment plan.
- Consent and Capacity Board
- The tribunal that reviews involuntary detention and treatment decisions in Ontario.
Practice problems
Work each problem on paper first, then reveal the answer to check.
What are the four parts of the section 17 test?
Show answer
Disorderly conduct; threat or attempt of self-harm, violence or fear caused, or lack of competence to care for self; apparent mental disorder likely to cause serious harm or impairment; danger in proceeding under section 16.
How long is a Form 2 valid?
Show answer
Seven days.
In the code example, what share of transports were handed over within an hour?
Show answer
114 of 420, about 0.27.
Why was the homeless man in the worked example not taken to hospital?
Show answer
The legal test was not met; a diagnosis, homelessness and refusing services are not enough.
Lesson quiz · 5 questions
Score 60% or more to complete this lesson.
Create a free account to save your progress, take quizzes and earn a certificate.