Electrical code requirements for communications systems

Two weeks before the design was issued for permit, Roz asked Daniel to do a code review of the telecommunications drawings and specification. 'Not the electrical drawings,' she said. 'Priya does those. Ours. Go through every bonding, protection and power item and find the code requirement it rests on. If you can't find one, it's a standard or owner requirement, and the specification should say so. If you find a code requirement we've missed, that's a problem.'

This lesson is about how the Canadian Electrical Code, Part I, deals with communications systems, and how an RCDD uses it. It does not reproduce the code's text, which is copyrighted and changes with each edition; an RCDD must own and read the current edition adopted where the project is. The aim is to know where the requirements are, what they are trying to achieve and how to apply them in a design.

How the code is organized

The Canadian Electrical Code, Part I, published by CSA Group as CSA C22.1, is organized into numbered sections. Section 0 contains definitions. Section 10 covers grounding and bonding for electrical systems. Section 16 covers Class 1 and Class 2 circuits, which include many low-voltage and power-limited circuits. Section 54 covers community antenna distribution and radio and television installations. Section 56 covers optical fiber cables. Section 60 covers electrical communication systems, including protectors, bonding of communication circuits, and the installation of communication wiring inside buildings. A new edition is published every three years, and each province and territory adopts it, usually with amendments, on its own schedule.

Two consequences follow. First, the edition and amendments in force where the project is located are what matter, not the latest edition the designer happens to own. Harbourview's permit application would be reviewed under the edition Ontario had adopted, which Daniel confirmed with the AHJ's published list. Second, rule numbers change between editions. A specification that cites a rule number should also cite the edition, or cite the requirement in words with a reference to the relevant section or article, so that it stays meaningful.

Protection and bonding at the entrance

The code's central requirements for communications systems deal with what lessons 6 and 7 covered: exposed circuits entering a building need listed or certified primary protection, located as close as practical to the point of entrance, and the protector must be bonded to the building's grounding system with a conductor of at least a minimum size, as short and straight as practical, run to one of a list of acceptable connection points. The code also requires the metallic sheath or shield of an entering cable to be bonded close to the entrance and sets requirements for conductive optical fibre cables and coaxial cables.

In Canada, the requirements for protectors and bonding of communication circuits are in Section 60, those for coaxial and antenna systems in Section 54, and those for optical fibre cables in Section 56. Daniel listed each requirement in a table in his review, with the clause, a summary in his own words and the drawing or specification item that met it.

The code's acceptable connection points for protector bonding conductors are listed in order of preference. The building's intersystem bonding connection at the service, or the grounding electrode system directly, are at the top. Further down are alternatives such as accessible means external to the service enclosure or metal structural parts, used only where the preferred points are not available. The PBB at Harbourview, bonded directly to the service ground bus by the TBC and located beside it, gave the protector a short path to the preferred point, and Daniel confirmed with the inspector before issue that this arrangement would be accepted.

Cable listings and fire ratings

Cables installed inside buildings must be listed or certified for the spaces they occupy, so that they do not spread fire or smoke beyond acceptable limits. In Canada, communication cables are marked with flame test ratings: FT6 for cables in plenums and other air-handling spaces, FT4 for vertical runs and general use, and FT1 for limited uses. Requirements for which rating may be used where are in Section 60 and, for fibre, Section 56, together with the building code. The same applies to bonding conductors in those spaces, as lesson 4 noted.

Fire stopping is a related requirement. Wherever a cable, conduit, sleeve or bonding conductor passes through a fire-rated wall or floor, the opening must be sealed with a tested firestop system that restores the rating. The building code and the fire code set the requirement, and the electrical code refers to it. The RCDD's drawings must show where pathways cross rated assemblies and require tested systems at each. Other courses in the RCDD program cover firestopping in detail.

Separation from power

The code requires communications wiring to be separated from power and lighting conductors, from electric light and power circuits in the same raceway or enclosure, and from certain other circuits, unless barriers or listed cables are used. The purpose is to prevent a fault in the power wiring from energizing communications wiring and to keep power conductors from damaging communications cable insulation. The specific distances and exceptions are in Section 60. Separation for performance reasons, to limit interference, is a separate question covered by the TIA pathway standards, and the two should not be confused.

Abandoned cable

Many editions of the Canadian code and provincial amendments, and most owner standards, now expect cable that is no longer used to be removed or tagged for future use, because abandoned cable adds fuel to fires and makes ceilings and pathways harder to manage. Daniel checked the adopted code and found the requirement that applied, and added a specification clause requiring removal of abandoned cable in any space the contractor worked in.

Power-limited circuits and PoE

Many circuits in modern buildings are power-limited: the source is designed so that the energy available on the circuit is low enough to limit fire and shock hazards. Ethernet with PoE, building automation sensors, nurse call and access control circuits often fall in this group. Section 16 of the Canadian code set requirements for these circuits, including cable types and, for PoE, limits that depend on conductor size, bundle size and cable temperature rating. Those rules are what lesson 9's bundle size limits were based on.

Health care occupancies

Harbourview includes clinic floors, which brings additional requirements. CSA Z32 sets requirements for electrical safety and essential electrical systems in health care facilities, including the grounding of patient care areas and the branches of the essential electrical system. The Canadian Electrical Code's Section 24 covers patient care areas. ICT equipment in patient care areas, nurse call systems and the network equipment that supports clinical systems may need to meet requirements for grounding, power branch and equipment listing beyond those for offices. The electrical engineer and the owner's clinical engineering team decide how they apply; the RCDD needs to know enough to ask.

Listing marks and substitutions

Every product the code requires to be listed or certified carries a mark from the testing organization that evaluated it. On cable, the mark and the rating are printed on the jacket at regular intervals; on protectors, SPDs, busbars and connectors, they appear on the product or its label. Inspectors check them, and an RCDD reviewing submittals should too. A cable marked with the right rating but no recognized certification mark, or a protector bought online with no listing at all, can fail inspection and must be replaced.

The code also explains which higher-rated cables may be used in place of lower-rated ones: an FT6 cable may generally be used where FT4 is required, but not the other way around. Daniel's specification allowed contractors to substitute higher-rated cable without approval but required approval for anything else, which saved arguments when a supplier was short of one type.

Submittal review is where many problems are caught. For Harbourview, Tomasz's office submitted data sheets for every busbar, lug, conductor, protector, SPD and rack bonding kit before ordering. Daniel checked each against the specification, the listing requirement and the maker's installation instructions, and rejected two items: a bonding conductor whose jacket was not rated for the plenum spaces in the college wing, and a set of single-hole lugs offered as an equivalent to the specified two-hole lugs.

Working with the AHJ

Where the code is unclear, or where a design uses an arrangement the code allows only with approval, the AHJ decides. Daniel's review produced three questions for the inspector: whether the PBB arrangement was acceptable as the protector bonding point, whether the rooftop antenna enclosure counted as the building entrance for the coaxial cables, and which cable ratings would be accepted in the open ceiling of the college lab. He asked them in writing, received written answers and filed them with the design. Roz's rule was that any answer that changed the design or justified an unusual choice had to be in writing.

The AHJ is also the inspector who will look at the finished work. An inspector who has seen the design and agreed with its approach before construction is much more likely to pass it quickly. Inviting the inspector to look at the PBB and protector area during construction, before walls are closed, avoids surprises.

Who may do the work

Licensing rules for electrical and communications work vary by province and territory. In many places the TBC and any connection to the electrical system must be installed by a licensed electrical contractor, while low-voltage communications cabling may be installed by a communications contractor with a different licence or none. The specification should assign each item to the right trade, and the RCDD should check the local rules rather than assume. At Harbourview, the electrical contractor installed the TBC, the panel SPDs and the TR panels; the cabling contractor installed busbars, the TBB, rack bonding and all communications cabling, protectors and data SPDs.