DCE-210 · Lesson 7 of 12 · 37 min
Carriers, peering and interconnection
A data centre is only useful if it is connected. Customers need to reach the applications inside, data centres need to reach each other, and companies need fast private links to cloud providers. All of this travels over fibre owned by telecommunications carriers and over the agreements networks make with each other. For some facilities, the connections are the main product: a carrier-neutral colocation building in a major city can be worth more for the hundreds of networks that meet inside it than for its power and cooling.
This chapter explains how the internet is stitched together from independent networks, how those networks exchange traffic, how a data centre is physically connected to carriers, what services carriers sell and how they are priced, and how engineers make connectivity resilient. It uses Canadian examples: the carriers, exchange points and regulators a designer works with in Canada.
A network of networks
The internet is not one network. It is more than 70,000 independent networks, each called an autonomous system (AS), that have agreed to exchange traffic. An autonomous system is a network run by one organization with one routing policy: an internet service provider, a cloud provider, a university, a content company or a large enterprise. Each has a unique AS number. The networks tell each other which blocks of IP addresses they can reach using BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), the same protocol Lesson 3 described inside fabrics. When you load a web page, your request may cross three or four autonomous systems, each passing it on according to its own business relationships.
Those relationships come in two basic kinds.
Transit
In a transit relationship, a customer network pays a provider to carry its traffic to and from the entire internet. The provider announces the customer's addresses to everyone it connects with and gives the customer routes to everywhere. Small and medium networks, enterprises and many data centre operators buy transit, usually from two or more providers for resilience.
At the top of the hierarchy are a few Tier 1 networks, such as Lumen, AT&T, NTT and Arelion, that can reach every destination on the internet without buying transit from anyone, because they peer with each other. Below them, Tier 2 networks both buy some transit and peer widely.
Peering
In a peering relationship, two networks exchange traffic directly, but only traffic between their own customers. Neither pays the other to reach the rest of the internet. Peering is often settlement-free: neither side pays, because both benefit roughly equally. It can also be paid, when one side benefits more. Peering reduces transit costs, shortens paths and lowers latency, because traffic goes directly from one network to the other instead of through a third party.
Content and cloud companies peer very widely. A large share of all internet traffic now flows directly from a few huge content and cloud networks into access networks, and a data centre that hosts both kinds of network becomes a natural place for them to meet.
Where networks meet
Networks interconnect physically in a few ways.
- Internet exchange points (IXPs): an IXP operates a shared switching fabric, often spread over several data centres in a city. Each member network connects one or more ports to it and can then peer with any other member over that single connection. An IXP lets a network peer with hundreds of others without running hundreds of separate cables.
- Private network interconnects (PNIs): when two networks exchange a lot of traffic, they connect directly with dedicated links, usually cross-connects within the same building. PNIs carry the largest flows between big content providers and access networks.
- Carrier hotels: certain buildings in major cities, often older downtown office towers converted decades ago, became the places where long-haul fibre routes converged. Because every network was there, every new network came too. These buildings are extremely dense with interconnection and are very hard to replicate.
In Canada, the largest exchange is TorIX in Toronto, one of the largest exchanges in North America by number of members. Others include QIX in Montreal, VanIX in Vancouver, YYCIX in Calgary, YEGIX in Edmonton, OttIX in Ottawa and MBIX in Winnipeg. Many are not-for-profit, and CIRA, the organization that runs the .ca domain, has supported the growth of Canadian exchanges so that Canadian traffic can stay in Canada instead of travelling through US cities. The country's best-known carrier hotel is 151 Front Street West in Toronto, which houses hundreds of networks; 555 West Hastings Street (Harbour Centre) plays a similar role in Vancouver.
Inside the building: the meet-me room
Inside a colocation data centre, carriers bring their fibre into one or more meet-me rooms (MMRs). Each carrier terminates its fibre on its own patch panels or in its own small racks in the MMR. Each customer's cage or suite also has fibre running back to the MMR. To connect a customer to a carrier, or two customers to each other, the data centre operator installs a cross-connect: a fibre patch cord, or a dedicated fibre run, between the two parties' panels.
Cross-connects are a recurring revenue stream for colocation operators, typically billed monthly per connection, and in a busy facility there may be tens of thousands of them. The operator keeps careful records of each one, because a single mislabelled fibre can take a customer offline. MMRs are high-security spaces with their own access control, separate from customer areas, and they need power, cooling and pathways like any other technical room. Large campuses usually have two MMRs on opposite sides of the building, each fed from a different entrance.
Carrier-neutral and carrier-specific facilities
A carrier-neutral data centre lets any carrier bring fibre into the building and lets customers buy from any of them. Competition between carriers keeps prices down and gives customers choice and resilience. Most large colocation providers are carrier-neutral, and the number of carriers "on net" in a building is one of the main things customers compare.
A carrier-owned data centre is run by a telecommunications company, and customers may be expected to use that carrier's services. Enterprise and hyperscale self-built data centres usually contract with a few carriers to bring diverse fibre to the campus and may also lay their own dark fibre to nearby colocation sites and to their other data centres.
What carriers sell
Data centre operators and their customers buy connectivity in several forms, from raw glass to finished internet service:
- Dark fibre: unlit fibre strands, leased (often for 10 to 20 years under an indefeasible right of use, or IRU) between two points. The customer installs its own optical equipment and can run as much capacity as that equipment allows. Hyperscale operators use dark fibre between their data centres in a metro area.
- Wavelengths: a dedicated optical channel on the carrier's DWDM system (Lesson 9), typically 10, 100 or 400 Gb/s, between two locations. The carrier operates the optics; the customer gets a transparent pipe.
- Ethernet private lines and Ethernet virtual circuits: layer 2 connections between sites, sold at a committed bandwidth.
- IP transit (dedicated internet access): a port onto the carrier's network with full internet connectivity, priced by bandwidth.
- MPLS VPNs and SD-WAN: private wide-area networks connecting an enterprise's offices and data centres.
- Cloud on-ramps: private connections into public cloud providers, such as AWS Direct Connect, Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute, Google Cloud Interconnect and Oracle FastConnect. Enterprises use them to reach the cloud with predictable performance instead of over the public internet. Colocation facilities that host on-ramps attract enterprise customers for that reason.
Burstable billing and the 95th percentile
IP transit is often billed on the 95th percentile of usage. The carrier measures the traffic on the port every five minutes for the whole month, sorts the samples, discards the highest 5% and bills at the highest remaining value. In a 30-day month there are \(30 \times 288 = 8640\) five-minute samples; the top 432 (36 hours' worth) are discarded.
The method lets customers burst briefly above their usual traffic without paying for it, while still charging for sustained use. Usually there is also a commit: a minimum amount billed every month whatever the usage. Traffic is measured in each direction and the higher of the two 95th percentiles is normally used.
Worked problem
A transit bill
A customer's 10 Gb/s transit port has a 95th percentile of 6.2 Gb/s outbound and 2.1 Gb/s inbound this month. The commit is 2 Gb/s and the price is $0.25 per Mb/s per month. What is the bill? (Prices here are illustrative.)
Show solution
- Use the higher direction: 6.2 Gb/s outbound.
- It is above the 2 Gb/s commit, so the commit does not apply.
- Convert: 6.2 Gb/s = 6200 Mb/s.
- Bill: \(6200 \times 0.25 = \$1550\) for the month.
Answer: $1550. If usage had been 1.5 Gb/s, the customer would still pay for the 2 Gb/s commit, $500.
Worked problem
Is peering worth it?
The same customer finds that 40% of its traffic goes to networks present at the local exchange point. Joining the exchange costs $1000 per month for the port plus $300 per month for the cross-connect. Is it worth it at 6.2 Gb/s? What if the 95th percentile were 60 Gb/s and a larger exchange port cost $2500 per month?
Show solution
- At 6.2 Gb/s, traffic moved to peering: \(0.40 \times 6200 = 2480\) Mb/s.
- Transit saving: \(2480 \times 0.25 = \$620\) per month.
- Cost of peering: \(1000 + 300 = \$1300\) per month. Not worth it on cost alone.
- At 60 Gb/s, traffic moved: \(0.40 \times 60{,}000 = 24{,}000\) Mb/s, saving \(24{,}000 \times 0.25 = \$6000\) per month.
- Cost: \(2500 + 300 = \$2800\). Saving minus cost: \$3200 per month.
Answer: Not worth it at 6.2 Gb/s on cost alone (it might still be worth it for lower latency), but clearly worth it at 60 Gb/s. Peering pays off as traffic grows, which is why large networks peer so widely.
Connecting the building
Getting fibre into a data centre is a construction project in its own right, and it is often on the critical path of the whole development.
Outside plant and entrances
Carriers reach a site through outside plant: fibre cables in underground conduits (ducts), on utility poles, or in trenches along roads and railways. At the property line, cables enter maintenance holes (manholes) or handholes, then run through the owner's conduits into a building entrance room. Good practice is at least two entrance points on different sides of the building, each fed by a separate conduit path from a separate street, so that a single excavator cannot cut every connection. The entrance conduits are usually a bank of several 100 mm (4 in) ducts, with spare ducts for future carriers.
In Canada, telecommunications is regulated federally by the CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission) under the Telecommunications Act. Carriers that want to build on public roads need the consent of the municipality, and the Act lets the CRTC settle the terms when a carrier and a municipality cannot agree. On private land the data centre owner grants easements. Major carriers include Bell, Rogers, Telus, Cogeco and Vidéotron, along with regional and wholesale fibre providers; a designer typically asks several to quote for diverse routes to the site early in planning.
Bringing new fibre to a greenfield site can take a year or more, especially if it involves permits for road crossings, railways, rivers or highways. It is one of the reasons site selection (DCE-410) looks closely at existing fibre routes.
Route diversity and shared risk
Two connections are only independent if they share nothing that can fail. Experienced designers check for shared risk: places where two "diverse" routes actually run in the same conduit, cross the same bridge, pass through the same carrier building or follow the same railway corridor. Two carriers may even lease fibre in the same cable from a third party. Carriers can provide route maps (often under a non-disclosure agreement) so that the owner can check physical separation.
Worked problem
What a shared section does to availability
A data centre has two fibre routes, each with an availability of 99.5% (fibre cuts and repairs take about 44 hours a year on each). (a) What is the availability of the connection if the routes are fully independent? (b) What if both routes cross the same bridge, and that shared section has an availability of 99.95%?
Show solution
- (a) Parallel and independent: the connection fails only if both routes fail. Unavailability = \(0.005 \times 0.005 = 0.000025\), so availability = 99.9975%, about 13 minutes a year.
- (b) The shared section is in series with the parallel pair: \(A = 0.9995 \times 0.999975 = 0.99948\).
- Unavailability = 0.00052 of a year, about 4.6 hours.
Answer: (a) 99.9975%, about 13 minutes of outage a year. (b) About 99.95%, or 4.6 hours a year: the short shared section dominates. Diversity is only as good as its weakest shared point.
The same reasoning (series and parallel availability, from DCE-200) applies to entrance rooms, meet-me rooms, and the routers and power feeding them. A building with two carriers that both terminate in the same meet-me room on the same power feed has a single point of failure in the middle.
Latency and distance
Light in optical fibre travels at about two-thirds of its speed in a vacuum: roughly 204,000 km/s, which is about 4.9 µs per kilometre. Fibre seldom follows a straight line; it follows roads and railways, so the route is often 1.2 to 1.5 times the straight-line distance. Every millisecond matters to some applications: financial trading, online gaming, real-time collaboration and synchronous storage replication.
Worked problem
Round-trip time between two cities
The fibre route between data centres in Toronto and Montreal is about 600 km. Estimate the round-trip time from propagation alone.
Show solution
- One way: \(600 \times 4.9 = 2940\) µs = 2.94 ms.
- Round trip: \(2 \times 2.94 = 5.9\) ms.
Answer: About 5.9 ms, before adding delays in routers and optical equipment, which typically add a few tenths of a millisecond. No equipment upgrade can beat this floor; only a shorter route can.
This physical limit shapes how cloud providers lay out their regions. Data centres in one availability zone, or a few zones in one region, are kept within roughly 100 km of each other so that synchronous replication stays within about a millisecond of round-trip time, while being far enough apart that a single local disaster is unlikely to hit all of them.
Interconnection as a design driver
For a colocation operator, connectivity shapes the building: how many meet-me rooms and where, how many entrance conduits, how much space is reserved for carrier racks, and how fibre pathways run from the MMRs to every customer suite. For a hyperscale campus, it shapes the site: diverse fibre routes to the campus, dark fibre to other campuses in the region, and enough duct capacity for decades of growth. For an AI training campus, outside connectivity may be modest compared with the enormous internal fabric, but it still needs diverse routes for data ingestion, management and inference traffic.
In every case, the engineer's job is to make sure that the physical paths, rooms, power and security support the network relationships the business depends on, and that no single conduit, room or power feed can sever them.
Common mistakes
MistakeAssuming two different carriers guarantee two physically diverse routes.
InsteadCarriers often share conduits, bridges or leased fibre. Ask for route maps and check for shared risk.
MistakeBringing both carrier entrances into the same side of the building or the same meet-me room.
InsteadUse separate entrances on different sides, separate conduit paths and, in larger buildings, two meet-me rooms on separate power.
MistakeBilling or budgeting transit on average traffic.
InsteadTransit is usually billed at the 95th percentile of 5-minute samples, which is well above the average.
MistakeExpecting faster equipment to cut long-distance latency.
InsteadPropagation (about 4.9 µs per km of fibre route) sets a floor; only a shorter route reduces it.
MistakeLeaving fibre to the end of a project.
InsteadNew fibre routes and permits can take a year or more; engage carriers during site selection.
Summary and key terms
- The internet is tens of thousands of autonomous systems that exchange routes with BGP.
- Transit is paid access to the whole internet; peering is direct exchange of each other's customer traffic, often settlement-free.
- Networks meet at internet exchange points, through private interconnects and in carrier hotels.
- Inside colocation buildings, carriers terminate in meet-me rooms and customers connect through cross-connects.
- Carriers sell dark fibre, wavelengths, Ethernet services, IP transit, private WANs and cloud on-ramps.
- Transit is often billed at the 95th percentile of 5-minute samples (top 5% discarded), with a monthly commit.
- Resilience requires separate entrances, conduit paths and rooms, with no shared risk; a short shared section can dominate availability.
- Fibre latency is about 4.9 µs per km of route; synchronous replication limits zones to roughly 100 km apart.
- Autonomous system (AS)
- A network under one administration with its own routing policy, identified by an AS number.
- BGP
- Border Gateway Protocol: the routing protocol networks use to exchange reachability information with each other.
- IP transit
- A paid service in which a provider carries a customer's traffic to and from the whole internet.
- Peering
- Two networks exchanging traffic directly between their own customers, often without payment.
- Internet exchange point (IXP)
- A shared switching fabric where many networks connect and peer with each other.
- Private network interconnect (PNI)
- A dedicated link between two networks, usually a cross-connect within one building.
- Cross-connect
- A physical cable, usually fibre, linking two customers' equipment in a data centre, typically through the meet-me room.
- Meet-me room (MMR)
- A secure room where carriers and customers terminate cables so they can be cross-connected.
- Carrier-neutral
- A data centre that lets any carrier bring fibre in and lets customers buy from any of them.
- Carrier hotel
- A building, usually downtown, where very many networks interconnect.
- Dark fibre
- Unlit fibre strands leased so that the customer provides its own optical equipment.
- Wavelength service
- A dedicated optical channel on a carrier's DWDM system, usually 10 to 400 Gb/s.
- Cloud on-ramp
- A private connection into a cloud provider's network from a data centre.
- Burstable (95th percentile) billing
- Billing at the 95th percentile of 5-minute traffic samples over a month.
- Route diversity
- Physically separate fibre paths and building entrances so a single event cannot cut all connections.
- Shared risk
- A point where supposedly separate paths share a conduit, bridge, building or other single cause of failure.
- CRTC
- Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission: the federal regulator of telecommunications in Canada.
Practice problems
Work each problem on paper first, then reveal the answer to check.
What is the difference between transit and peering?
Show answer
Transit is a paid service giving access to the entire internet. Peering exchanges only the two networks' own customer traffic, often without payment.
How many five-minute samples are discarded in 95th-percentile billing for a 31-day month?
Show answer
31 × 288 = 8928 samples; 5% = 446.4, so 446 samples (about 37 hours).
A port's 95th percentiles are 3.4 Gb/s inbound and 4.8 Gb/s outbound, the commit is 5 Gb/s and the price is $0.30 per Mb/s. What is the monthly bill?
Show answer
The higher direction is 4.8 Gb/s, below the 5 Gb/s commit, so the bill is 5000 × 0.30 = $1500.
Moving 30% of 20 Gb/s of traffic to peering would cost $1800 per month. At $0.20 per Mb/s transit, is it worth it?
Show answer
Saving = 0.3 × 20,000 × 0.20 = $1200 per month, less than $1800. Not worth it on cost alone.
Estimate the propagation round-trip time over a 1200 km fibre route.
Show answer
1200 × 4.9 µs = 5.88 ms one way; about 11.8 ms round trip.
A synchronous replication system needs a round-trip time under 2 ms, and equipment adds 0.3 ms. What is the longest fibre route allowed?
Show answer
Propagation budget 1.7 ms round trip = 0.85 ms one way; 850 µs ÷ 4.9 µs/km = 173 km.
Two independent routes each have 99.8% availability. What is the combined availability, in minutes of outage per year?
Show answer
Unavailability = 0.002² = 4 × 10⁻⁶; 99.9996%, about 2.1 minutes a year.
The routes in the previous question share a 99.99%-available conduit section. What is the new availability?
Show answer
0.9999 × 0.999996 = 0.999896, about 55 minutes a year: the shared section dominates.
Why do colocation operators value having many carriers in a building?
Show answer
Customers can choose and combine carriers, prices are competitive, resilience is better, and networks attract other networks, making the building more valuable for interconnection.
List three things a designer should check to make sure two fibre connections are truly diverse.
Show answer
Separate building entrances on different sides; separate conduit paths and streets with no shared bridges or corridors; different carrier routes and central offices (no shared leased cable); and separate meet-me rooms and power.
Lesson quiz · 5 questions
Score 60% or more to complete this lesson.
Create a free account to save your progress, take quizzes and earn a certificate.