Codes and inspection review

Harjit Gill, Ironbridge's quality control manager, takes the code night, with Grant Mahler, the ABSA safety codes officer from the V-412 repair in BLR-320, as a guest. "Code questions frighten people because the books are thick," Harjit says. "But the exam doesn't expect you to quote paragraphs. It expects you to know which book covers what, who is allowed to do what, what paperwork comes out at the end, and the handful of numbers every boilermaker should know." Codes and inspection run through new construction and repair work, activities C and D. This lesson reviews why pressure equipment is regulated, the ASME code and its sections, design and thickness, welding and materials, the Canadian system of CSA B51 and ABSA, repairs and alterations, quality programs and documentation, as taught in BLR-320.

Why pressure equipment is regulated

Pressure equipment is regulated because it stores energy that can be released violently. The boiler explosions of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries killed thousands of people, and the explosion of a shoe factory boiler in Brockton, Massachusetts, in 1905 led to the first state boiler law and, in 1914, the first edition of the ASME Boiler Code. Today design, construction, inspection and repair are all controlled: by codes that set technical rules, by laws that make those codes compulsory, and by inspectors who check that the work meets them. BLR-320 lesson 1 covers the history.

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code is published in sections, and the exam expects you to know what the main ones cover. Section I covers power boilers, including their external piping. Section II covers materials, in parts for ferrous materials, nonferrous materials, welding consumables and material properties. Section IV covers heating boilers. Section V covers nondestructive examination methods. Section VIII covers pressure vessels, in three divisions, of which Division 1 is by far the most common. And Section IX covers the qualification of welding and brazing procedures and of welders and welding operators. A new edition is published every two years, and in most cases it becomes mandatory for new construction six months after its date. BLR-320 lesson 2 covers the code's structure.

Design and thickness

The code sets the rules for calculating the required thickness of each part. For a cylindrical shell under internal pressure, Section VIII Division 1 gives, in paragraph UG-27, the thickness needed to resist the circumferential, or hoop, stress, which is the larger of the two stresses in a cylinder. The formula uses the design pressure, the inside radius, the material's allowable stress at design temperature and the joint efficiency of the long seam, and the corrosion allowance is added to the result. The joint efficiency depends on the extent of radiography of the seam, from UW-12: 1.0 for full radiography of a double-welded butt joint, 0.85 for spot radiography and 0.70 for none. Less radiography means a thicker shell for the same pressure.

The same formula, rearranged, gives the maximum allowable working pressure of a shell whose thickness has been measured, which is how an inspector rates a corroded vessel. The code below calculates the required thickness at three joint efficiencies, then the MAWP of a shell measured thinner than expected.

# Codes review: shell thickness from UG-27, MAWP from measured thickness, and joint efficiency
P, R, S = 1500, 600, 138000          # design pressure, inside radius, allowable stress
CA = 3.0                         # corrosion allowance
for E, rt in ((1.0, "full radiography"), (0.85, "spot radiography"), (0.70, "no radiography")):
    t = P * R / (S * E - 0.6 * P) + CA
    print(f"E = {E:.2f} ({rt:17}): required thickness {t:.2f} mm")
t_meas = 9.5
E = 0.85
mawp = S * E * (t_meas - CA) / (R + 0.6 * (t_meas - CA))
print(f"measured {t_meas} mm with E = 0.85: MAWP {mawp:.0f} kPa")

E = 1.00 (full radiography ): required thickness 9.56 mm
E = 0.85 (spot radiography ): required thickness 10.73 mm
E = 0.70 (no radiography   ): required thickness 12.40 mm
measured 9.5 mm with E = 0.85: MAWP 1263 kPa

The required thickness rises from 9.56 to 12.40 mm as the joint efficiency falls from full radiography to none, which is why most vessels' long seams are radiographed. A shell measured at 9.5 mm with spot radiography has an MAWP of 1,263 kPa, below its 1,500 kPa design pressure: it must be repaired, re-rated or replaced.

Post-weld heat treatment is also set by the code. For carbon steel, P-number 1, Section VIII requires PWHT above a nominal thickness of about 38 mm (1 1/2 in), or above 32 mm (1 1/4 in) unless preheat is applied, with exemptions and exceptions set out in UCS-56. Other P-numbers have their own thresholds and holding temperatures. BLR-320 lessons 3 and 4 cover Section I and Section VIII.

Welding qualifications and materials

Section IX qualifies procedures and welders separately. A procedure is qualified by welding a test coupon, testing it and recording the results on a procedure qualification record, the PQR; the welding procedure specification, the WPS, then gives the welder the ranges of the essential variables, such as base metal P-number, filler metal F-number, thickness and process, within which the procedure is valid. A welder is qualified by welding a test coupon to a WPS and passing bend tests or radiography; the welder's performance qualification lists the processes, positions, thicknesses and diameters qualified. Materials are traceable: each plate, pipe and fitting carries a heat number that matches its mill test report, which shows its chemistry and properties, and the heat numbers are transferred to any piece cut from it. BLR-320 lessons 5 and 6 cover welding and materials.

CSA B51, ABSA and registration

In Canada each province regulates pressure equipment under its own law, and every province adopts CSA B51, the Boiler, Pressure Vessel and Pressure Piping Code, which in turn calls up the ASME code for design and construction. In Alberta the law is the Safety Codes Act and the Pressure Equipment Safety Regulation, and the work is administered by ABSA, the pressure equipment safety authority, under delegated authority since 1995. A design must be registered before it is built: the designer submits drawings and calculations to the authority, which reviews them and assigns a Canadian registration number, or CRN, ending in a digit that shows the provinces where the design is registered. Fittings are registered in the same way. ABSA's safety codes officers inspect new construction, repairs and alterations and in-service equipment, and ABSA certifies the quality programs of companies that build and repair pressure equipment and the pressure welders who work on it. BLR-320 lessons 7 and 8 cover the Canadian system.

Repairs, alterations and documentation

Work on pressure equipment in service is either a repair, which restores the equipment to a safe condition without changing its design, or an alteration, which changes something that affects its pressure-containing capability, such as a new nozzle larger than the code's limit or a change of design pressure. Alterations need design work and, in Alberta, registration of the change. Both are done by an organization with an authorized quality program, under the inspection of a safety codes officer, and documented with ABSA's repair or alteration report. In Alberta the NBIC's rules are used alongside CSA B51 for repair methods. BLR-320 lesson 9 covers repairs.

Every piece of ASME code equipment has a nameplate stamped with the ASME certification mark and a designator: U for Section VIII Division 1 vessels, S for power boilers and PP for pressure piping, among others. The nameplate also shows the manufacturer, serial number, year built, MAWP at a stated temperature and minimum design metal temperature, and the extent of radiography. The manufacturer's data report, such as the U-1 for a Division 1 vessel, records the design, materials and tests and is signed by the manufacturer and the inspector. The nameplate and data report must agree; a serial number that does not match is a stop-work issue. BLR-320 lessons 10 and 11 cover quality programs and documentation.

Traps in code questions

Harjit's traps: confusing Section VIII, vessels, with Section I, boilers; thinking Section IX is about inspection; using a joint efficiency of 1.0 for a seam that was only spot radiographed; calling any new nozzle a repair; and thinking the inspector can be skipped for a small repair. Every repair on registered pressure equipment involves the inspector, however small.

In-service inspection and the owner's program

Once pressure equipment is in service, it is inspected at intervals that keep it safe for the conditions it sees. In Alberta, owners of pressure equipment can run an integrity management program that ABSA has accepted, which sets inspection intervals and methods for each item based on its condition and the damage mechanisms that affect it, and uses inspectors approved under the program; ABSA audits the program. Equipment outside such a program is inspected by ABSA at the intervals the regulation sets. Either way, records are kept of every inspection, thickness reading, repair and alteration, and the records follow the equipment through its life.

For the boilermaker, the in-service system matters in three practical ways. First, no repair or alteration starts without the inspector being told and, where required, accepting the plan. Second, the boilermaker's own records, such as welder qualifications, material traceability, heat treatment charts, examination results and the pressure test record, become part of the equipment's file, so they must be complete and legible. Third, the inspector's findings decide the scope of much turnaround work, which is why the inspection plan is one of the first inputs to the work list, as reviewed in lesson 11.

Numbers every boilermaker should know

Harjit ends the night with the short list of code numbers the study group should know without looking up. They are not the whole code, and the exam provides formulas, but they come up again and again, and knowing them lets you spot a wrong answer immediately.

Each of these numbers carries its own condition: the stress ratio, the type of joint, the process, the jurisdiction's rules. Harjit's last piece of advice is to learn the condition with the number, because exam distractors are often the right number applied in the wrong situation, such as 1.5 offered for a vessel's hydrotest.

Grant adds one more point from the inspector's side. Most of the problems he finds on repair jobs are not bad welds but missing paperwork: a heat number not transferred to a cut piece, a heat treatment chart without the thermocouple locations, a welder's continuity record that stops in the autumn, an examination report that does not say which welds it covers. Each one means the work cannot be accepted until the gap is closed, and closing it after the fact can take longer than the repair itself. The habit that prevents it is to fill in the record when the work is done, at the work site, by the person who did it, and to check it at every hold point rather than at the end.