HSE-241 · Lesson 3 of 12 · 25 min
Exposure limits and the law
An exposure limit turns the biology of Lesson 1 and the physics of Lesson 2 into a rule a workplace can follow. It says how much noise a worker may receive in a day before the employer must act. The limit itself is only part of the law. Regulations also say how exposure is measured, which controls come first, when hearing protectors may be used, when hearing tests are needed and what training and records are required. This lesson explains how limits are built, compares the approaches used in Canada and the United States, and sets out the legal framework in your jurisdiction.
Exposure limits are not a line between safe and harmful. At OSHA's permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA, NIOSH estimates that roughly a quarter of workers exposed over a working lifetime would develop a material hearing impairment, and even at 85 dBA the excess risk is about 8 percent. The limits reflect a judgment about acceptable risk, and good programs aim well below them.
The parts of a noise exposure limit
Every occupational noise limit has three parts.
| Part | What it means | Common values |
|---|---|---|
| Criterion level | The steady A-weighted level allowed for a full 8-hour day | 85 dBA in most of Canada; 87 dBA federally in Canada; 90 dBA for OSHA and MSHA; 85 dBA recommended by NIOSH |
| Exchange rate | The change in level that doubles or halves the allowed time | 3 dB in Canada and in NIOSH and ACGIH recommendations; 5 dB for OSHA and MSHA |
| Peak limit | A ceiling for impulse noise that no exposure should exceed | 140 dB peak (usually C-weighted) in many jurisdictions |
The criterion level and the exchange rate together define the allowable time at any level. With an 85 dBA criterion and a 3 dB exchange rate, a worker may be exposed to 85 dBA for 8 hours, 88 dBA for 4 hours, 91 dBA for 2 hours, 94 dBA for 1 hour and 100 dBA for only 15 minutes. With a 90 dBA criterion and a 5 dB exchange rate, the times are 8 hours at 90, 4 hours at 95, 2 hours at 100, 1 hour at 105 and 15 minutes at 115.
In the formula, T is the allowable time, L is the A-weighted level, Lc is the criterion level and E is the exchange rate.
Why the exchange rate matters so much
The 3 dB exchange rate follows the equal-energy principle: a doubling of acoustic energy, which is a 3 dB increase, halves the allowable time, so the total energy received is the same. Most scientific bodies, including NIOSH, ACGIH and the International Organization for Standardization, support the 3 dB rule. The 5 dB rule dates from the 1960s and assumed that intermittent noise, with quiet breaks, allows the ear to recover. It is more permissive at high levels. At 100 dBA, a 3 dB rule with an 85 dBA criterion allows 15 minutes; a 5 dB rule with a 90 dBA criterion allows 2 hours, eight times longer.
def allowable_hours(level, criterion, exchange):
return 8 / 2 ** ((level - criterion) / exchange)
def fmt(h):
return f"{h:5.2f} h" if h >= 1 else f"{h * 60:5.1f} min"
rules = {"85 dBA / 3 dB": (85, 3), "87 dBA / 3 dB": (87, 3), "90 dBA / 5 dB": (90, 5)}
print("Level " + "".join(f"{name:>16}" for name in rules))
for level in range(85, 116, 3):
row = "".join(f"{fmt(allowable_hours(level, c, e)):>16}" for c, e in rules.values())
print(f"{level} dBA" + row)Level 85 dBA / 3 dB 87 dBA / 3 dB 90 dBA / 5 dB 85 dBA 8.00 h 12.70 h 16.00 h 88 dBA 4.00 h 6.35 h 10.56 h 91 dBA 2.00 h 3.17 h 6.96 h 94 dBA 1.00 h 1.59 h 4.59 h 97 dBA 30.0 min 47.6 min 3.03 h 100 dBA 15.0 min 23.8 min 2.00 h 103 dBA 7.5 min 11.9 min 1.32 h 106 dBA 3.8 min 6.0 min 52.2 min 109 dBA 1.9 min 3.0 min 34.5 min 112 dBA 0.9 min 1.5 min 22.7 min 115 dBA 0.5 min 0.7 min 15.0 min
The table shows how quickly the rules diverge. At 85 dBA the differences hardly matter. At 103 dBA, a common level for grinding or cutting, a Canadian provincial worker reaches the limit in under 8 minutes, while the OSHA limit allows over an hour.
The law in the United States
In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 gives OSHA authority to set and enforce standards for most private-sector employers, either directly or through state plans that must be at least as effective as federal OSHA. Several state plans, including California, Washington and Oregon, have their own noise rules that follow the federal model with some differences. Mining is regulated separately by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), and some transportation sectors fall under other federal agencies. Public-sector workers are covered only in state-plan states.
| Rule | Criterion and exchange rate | Other key points |
|---|---|---|
| OSHA general industry (29 CFR 1910.95) | 90 dBA PEL, 5 dB; 85 dBA action level | Feasible engineering or administrative controls above the PEL; hearing conservation program at or above the action level; 140 dB peak should not be exceeded |
| OSHA construction (29 CFR 1926.52 and 1926.101) | 90 dBA, 5 dB | Requires a continuing, effective hearing conservation program above the limit, without the detailed elements of 1910.95 |
| MSHA (30 CFR Part 62) | 90 dBA PEL, 5 dB; 85 dBA action level | Dual hearing protection required at very high exposures; hearing conservation program and audiometric testing |
| NIOSH recommended exposure limit (1998) | 85 dBA, 3 dB | Not enforceable; widely used as best practice and by many employers as an internal limit |
| ACGIH threshold limit value | 85 dBA, 3 dB | Not enforceable in the US; adopted in law by many other jurisdictions |
A closer look at 29 CFR 1910.95
The general industry noise standard is the most detailed US rule and the model for most employer programs. Its main requirements are these.
| Paragraph | Requirement |
|---|---|
| (b) | Above the PEL, feasible administrative or engineering controls must be used; protectors are required if those controls fail to reduce exposure to the PEL |
| (c) | A continuing, effective hearing conservation program is required whenever exposure equals or exceeds an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA, which is a dose of 50 percent |
| (d) | Monitoring must identify exposed employees and be repeated when changes may increase exposure; measurement integrates all sound from 80 to 130 dBA |
| (e) | Employees must be notified of monitoring results at or above 85 dBA and may observe monitoring |
| (g) | Baseline audiogram within 6 months of first exposure at or above the action level, and annual audiograms thereafter |
| (g)(8) and (10) | Standard threshold shifts must be reported to the employee within 21 days and followed up |
| (i) and (j) | Hearing protectors must be available at no cost to all exposed employees, required for some, and must attenuate exposure to 90 dBA or to 85 dBA after a standard threshold shift |
| (k) | Annual training on the effects of noise, protectors and audiometric testing |
| (m) | Exposure measurement records kept 2 years; audiometric records kept for the duration of employment |
A long-standing OSHA enforcement policy has generally allowed employers to rely on hearing protectors within an effective hearing conservation program, rather than being cited for missing engineering controls, unless exposures are very high. A 2010 proposal to change that interpretation was withdrawn in 2011. Employers should not treat the policy as permission to ignore engineering controls: the regulation still requires feasible controls above the PEL, and good practice and many internal standards apply the NIOSH limit of 85 dBA with a 3 dB exchange rate.
Program requirements beyond the limit
The exposure limit is only the trigger. What really protects workers is the set of program elements that apply once noise is above certain levels. These typically include an exposure assessment, controls, signs or posting of noisy areas, provision and selection of protectors, training, audiometric testing and records.
| Element | OSHA 1910.95 requirement |
|---|---|
| Monitoring | When exposure may equal or exceed 85 dBA TWA; repeated when changes may increase exposure |
| Controls | Feasible engineering or administrative controls above 90 dBA TWA |
| Posting | A copy of the standard posted in the workplace; no general requirement to post noisy areas, though many employers do |
| Protectors | Available at no cost to all employees at or above 85 dBA; required above 90 dBA and for employees with a standard threshold shift |
| Training | Annual training for employees at or above 85 dBA |
| Audiometric testing | Baseline and annual audiograms for employees at or above 85 dBA |
| Records | Exposure records 2 years; audiometric records for the duration of employment; recordable hearing loss on the OSHA 300 log under 29 CFR 1904.10 |
Worked problem
Applying the limit to a mixed day
A sheet metal worker in a general industry shop spends 2 hours at 96 dBA and the rest of an 8-hour shift at 80 dBA. Is the worker over the PEL or the action level, and what does the employer have to do?
Show solution
- With a 90 dBA PEL and 5 dB exchange rate, 96 dBA is allowed for 8 ÷ 2^(6/5) ≈ 3.5 hours, so 2 hours uses about 57 percent of the dose.
- Under 1910.95 the 6 hours at 80 dBA count toward the action level dose but not the PEL dose, which ignores levels below 90 dBA.
- PEL dose is about 57 percent, so the worker is under the PEL. For the action level, 80 dBA is allowed for 32 hours, adding 6 ÷ 32 ≈ 19 percent, for a total of about 76 percent, a TWA of about 88 dBA.
- The worker is above the 85 dBA action level, so the employer must include the worker in the hearing conservation program: monitoring notification, audiometric testing, training and protectors available at no cost. Engineering controls are not required by the PEL, but they remain the best way to reduce risk.
Answer: Under the PEL but above the action level. The worker must be in a hearing conservation program with audiometric testing, training and protectors.
The general duty and due diligence
Even where a standard is silent, such as on detailed program elements in construction, the OSH Act's general duty clause requires employers to keep the workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Supervisors are the employer's agents for enforcing protector use and safe practices. A well-documented program, including monitoring results, a consideration of engineering controls, protector selection, training records and audiometric follow-up, is the employer's best evidence of compliance and the best way to protect workers.
Limits are minimums
Because current limits still leave a measurable risk of hearing loss, many employers set internal targets below the legal limit. Common choices are to use 85 dBA with a 3 dB exchange rate even where the law allows 90 dBA and 5 dB, to aim for protected exposures between 70 and 80 dBA rather than just under the limit, and to start audiometric testing and training at 80 or 82 dBA for workers whose exposures fluctuate. Buy-quiet purchasing policies, covered in Lesson 6, aim to keep new equipment below 80 or 85 dBA at the operator position.
Common mistakes
MistakeTreating the exposure limit as a safe level.
InsteadRecognize that limits still leave a measurable risk and aim for exposures well below them.
MistakeApplying the wrong exchange rate, for example using 5 dB in a province that uses 3 dB.
InsteadUse the criterion level and exchange rate of the jurisdiction that governs the workplace.
MistakeCounting the attenuation of hearing protectors when deciding whether exposure exceeds the limit.
InsteadAssess exposure without protectors, then use protectors only as allowed after controls are considered.
MistakeReaching straight for earplugs because they are cheap.
InsteadDocument why engineering controls and work practices are or are not practicable before relying on protectors.
MistakeAssuming no audiometric testing is needed because the regulation does not mention it.
InsteadUse audiometric testing as the main check that the program works, as recommended in program standards.
Summary and key terms
- A noise limit has a criterion level, an exchange rate and often a peak limit.
- Canada uses 85 dBA with a 3 dB exchange rate in every province and territory, and 87 dBA federally; OSHA and MSHA use 90 dBA with a 5 dB exchange rate and an 85 dBA action level.
- The 3 dB exchange rate follows the equal-energy principle and is far stricter than the 5 dB rule at high levels.
- Regulations put engineering controls and work practices before hearing protectors, and exposure is assessed without protectors.
- Program elements such as assessment, posting, protectors, training, audiometric testing and records apply once noise exceeds set levels, and they vary by jurisdiction.
- The general duty and due diligence apply even where a regulation is silent.
- Limits are minimums; many employers set stricter internal targets.
- Criterion level
- The steady A-weighted level allowed for an 8-hour day.
- Exchange rate
- The increase in level that halves the allowable exposure time.
- Equal-energy principle
- The idea that equal amounts of acoustic energy cause equal hearing risk, which leads to the 3 dB exchange rate.
- Lex,8
- The A-weighted noise exposure level normalized to an 8-hour day.
- Permissible exposure limit (PEL)
- OSHA's enforceable limit, 90 dBA as an 8-hour TWA with a 5 dB exchange rate.
- Action level
- The exposure, 85 dBA TWA in OSHA and MSHA rules, at which a hearing conservation program is required.
- Recommended exposure limit (REL)
- NIOSH's recommended limit of 85 dBA with a 3 dB exchange rate.
- Peak limit
- The maximum instantaneous level allowed for impulse noise, commonly 140 dB.
- General duty
- The broad legal obligation to protect workers, which applies even where specific regulations are silent.
- Due diligence
- Taking all reasonable precautions in the circumstances; the main defense to a charge under Canadian OHS law.
Practice problems
Work each problem on paper first, then reveal the answer to check.
With an 85 dBA criterion and 3 dB exchange rate, how long may a worker be exposed to 97 dBA?
Show answer
8 ÷ 2^4 = 0.5 hours, or 30 minutes.
With a 90 dBA criterion and 5 dB exchange rate, how long is allowed at 100 dBA?
Show answer
2 hours.
What exchange rate does the equal-energy principle produce?
Show answer
3 dB.
What is the federal Canadian criterion level?
Show answer
87 dBA with a 3 dB exchange rate.
At what exposure must OSHA general industry employers start a hearing conservation program?
Show answer
At or above an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA, the action level.
Why is exposure assessed without counting hearing protectors?
Show answer
So that the need for controls is judged on the real noise hazard, and protectors are treated as a last resort.
Name four of the grounds in O. Reg. 381/15 for relying on hearing protectors.
Show answer
Controls not in existence or obtainable; not reasonable or practical; temporary breakdown; emergency.
Which Canadian jurisdictions mentioned require audiometric testing by regulation?
Show answer
Examples include British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, PEI and Yukon.
How long must OSHA audiometric records be kept?
Show answer
For the duration of the affected employee's employment.
Why do many employers set internal limits below the legal limit?
Show answer
Because legal limits still leave a measurable risk of hearing loss.
Lesson quiz · 5 questions
Score 60% or more to complete this lesson.
Create a free account to save your progress, take quizzes and earn a certificate.