Weather data

Holm opens the second seminar by projecting a file that looks like nothing at all: a few header lines, then 8,760 rows of comma-separated numbers. 'This is the most important input to every energy model you will ever run, and the one architects look at least,' he says. It is the weather file for Winnipeg: one row for every hour of a year, each giving the dry-bulb temperature, dew point, humidity, pressure, wind speed and direction, cloud cover and several kinds of solar radiation. Every simulation of the hub, from heating energy to daylight to overheating, starts from a file like this. 'If the weather is wrong, nothing downstream can be right.'

What a weather file contains

Simulation programs read hourly weather in standard formats, the most common being the EnergyPlus weather format (EPW). Each hour records the variables that drive heat flow and light in a building.

Holm points out two things that students often miss. First, solar radiation is split into direct and diffuse parts, and the split matters as much as the total: a clear winter day on the Prairies, with low sun and intense direct radiation, behaves very differently from an overcast day with the same total. Second, snow raises ground reflectance from about 0.2 to as much as 0.7 or more, which adds a great deal of reflected light and solar gain to windows in a Prairie or Midwest winter. A weather file without snow information, or a program that ignores it, will underestimate winter daylight and solar gain.

Typical years

A single real year is a poor basis for design, because any particular year may be unusually warm or cold, sunny or dull. Simulation therefore uses a typical year assembled from many real ones. The usual method, developed in the United States in the 1970s, picks for each calendar month the real month from a long record, often 15 to 30 years, whose statistics are closest to the long-term statistics for that month. January might come from 1998, February from 2011, and so on, with the joins smoothed. The result is a year that is typical month by month while still containing the real day-to-day weather of actual months.

In Canada, the standard typical files are the Canadian Weather Year for Energy Calculation (CWEC). Environment and Climate Change Canada released an updated set, CWEC 2020, based on more recent records. The National Building Code and the NECB use these files for performance compliance. Typical files come from airport stations, which may differ from the building's site: an airport on open land at the edge of a city is cooler at night and windier than a dense neighbourhood with its urban heat island.

A typical year is typical, which means it contains few extremes. It is the right file for annual energy use and for comparing options, but the wrong one for sizing equipment or testing resilience. For those questions the designer needs design conditions, such as the temperature exceeded only 0.4 hours in 100 in summer or the temperature colder than which only 0.4 hours in 100 fall in winter, the so-called 99.6 heating design temperature, and extreme years.

Holm's favourite way to look at a weather file is the heat map: 365 columns of 24 cells, shaded by temperature. It shows at a glance the length of the heating season, the daily swing, the persistence of cold snaps and the number of warm nights, which matter more for overheating than warm afternoons. He makes the students draw heat maps of temperature, solar radiation and wind before they run any model, and asks them to say in words what the building will have to cope with.

Degree-days and design temperatures

Many quick calculations use statistics derived from the hourly file. Heating degree-days sum, over every day of the year, how far the day's mean temperature falls below a base temperature, usually 18 °C (65 °F). Cooling degree-days do the same above the base. Design temperatures summarize the extremes.

The students write a short program that builds a synthetic year of hourly temperatures, with a seasonal curve, a daily swing and random weather systems that persist for several days, and then calculates its degree-days and design temperatures. The synthetic year is not a substitute for a real weather file, but building one shows what a weather file is made of. The same program then applies a simple future shift, of the kind used to create future weather files.

# A synthetic year of hourly temperatures, its statistics, and a simple future shift
import math, random
random.seed(510)
MEAN, SWING, DAILY = 2.6, 19.5, 5.0     # annual mean, seasonal half-range, daily half-range (C)
temps = []
anom = 0.0
for h in range(8760):
    day = h // 24; hour = h % 24
    anom = 0.97 * anom + random.gauss(0, 1.25)           # weather systems that persist for days
    t = MEAN - SWING * math.cos(2 * math.pi * (day - 15) / 365) - DAILY * math.cos(2 * math.pi * (hour - 3) / 24) + anom
    temps.append(t)

def stats(ts):
    daily = [sum(ts[d * 24:(d + 1) * 24]) / 24 for d in range(365)]
    hdd = sum(max(18.0 - t, 0) for t in daily)
    cdd = sum(max(t - 18.0, 0) for t in daily)
    s = sorted(ts)
    return hdd, cdd, s[int(0.004 * 8760)], s[int(0.996 * 8760)]

def morph(ts, shift, stretch):
    """Shift every hour and stretch it about its month's mean (the approach behind morphed weather files)."""
    out = []
    for m in range(12):
        chunk = ts[m * 730:(m + 1) * 730]
        mu = sum(chunk) / len(chunk)
        out += [t + shift + stretch * (t - mu) for t in chunk]
    return out

for label, ts in (("present", temps), ("2050s shift", morph(temps, 2.6, 0.06))):
    hdd, cdd, cold, hot = stats(ts)
    print(f"{label:12s} HDD {hdd * 1:6.0f}  CDD {cdd * 1:5.0f}  99.6 cold {cold * 1 + 0:6.1f} C  0.4 hot {hot * 1 + 0:5.1f} C")

present      HDD   5934  CDD   321  99.6 cold  -28.6 C  0.4 hot  33.7 C
2050s shift  HDD   5202  CDD   538  99.6 cold  -26.9 C  0.4 hot  37.0 C

The synthetic Winnipeg year has about 5,900 heating degree-days, close to the real figure of about 5,700, and only about 320 cooling degree-days. Its 99.6 heating design temperature, about −29 °C, is milder than the real design value of about −33 °C, and Holm asks why. Ingrid sees it: the random part of the synthetic weather is symmetric, so cold snaps are no deeper than warm spells. Real Prairie winters are not symmetric; outbreaks of Arctic air drive temperatures much further below the average than warm spells rise above it. A model fed symmetric weather would undersize the backup heat the hub's heat pumps need on the coldest nights, the very problem the students met in Environmental Systems II.

Future weather

A building designed today will operate for sixty years or more in a climate that is already changing. A typical year built from the records of 1990 to 2020 describes a climate that is passing. Designers increasingly test buildings with future weather files, created by adjusting historical files to match the projections of climate models.

The simplest method, called morphing, shifts and stretches each hour of a historical typical year so that its monthly means and ranges match a projected future climate. The temperature for hour h of month m becomes the original value plus the projected change in the monthly mean, plus a stretch of its deviation from the monthly mean.

In the students' program, a shift of 2.6 °C (4.7 °F) with a small stretch cuts heating degree-days by an eighth or more and raises cooling degree-days by more than half; the hot design temperature rises by more than 3 °C. Morphing keeps the real sequence of weather, which is its strength and its weakness: it cannot create heat waves longer or more frequent than those in the original record, only hotter versions of them.

Canadian designers now have two national sets of future weather files. The Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium produced morphed versions of the CWEC files for the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s under a high-emissions scenario, using an ensemble of climate models. The National Research Council produced a second set from a large ensemble of the Canadian Regional Climate Model, organized not by date but by global warming level, from +0.5 °C to +3.5 °C, with typical, extreme cold, extreme warm and moisture reference years for each. The 2025 national model codes also adopt climatic data that reflect projected future conditions. Holm prefers files organized by warming level, because they separate two uncertain questions: how much the world will warm, and what that warming means for a given city.

Extreme years and resilience

For resilience questions the team needs weather that tests the building rather than describes its average year. The National Research Council's extreme warm and extreme cold years were built for this purpose; elsewhere designers select the hottest or coldest real year in the record or construct a heat wave. Sethi, who joins this seminar, describes a recent study for a seniors' residence: the typical year showed no overheating at all, but a morphed 2050s year and a real heat-wave week each showed several days above safe limits in the top-floor apartments. 'If I had only run the typical year, I would have reported that the building was fine.'

She adds a practical caution: a model run with a hot future file will report higher cooling energy, and clients sometimes conclude that the design is worse. The right comparison is between design options run with the same future weather. The point of future files is not to predict next year's bill but to make sure the building chosen today will still work when the climate changes.

Microclimate

The weather at the airport is not the weather at the building. A dense site may be 2 to 3 °C (4 to 5 °F) warmer at night than the open airport, especially in summer; a site by the river may be windier and more humid; a building may be shaded by its neighbours for much of the winter. Advanced tools can adjust weather files for the urban heat island and model shading by surrounding buildings in detail. At minimum, the designer should know how the site differs from the weather station and test whether the difference changes the conclusions.

Exercise 2: reading the weather

Each student downloads the current typical weather file for Winnipeg and one future file, and prepares a two-page weather study.

• Draw heat maps of temperature and global solar radiation for both files.
• Calculate heating and cooling degree-days and the design temperatures from each.
• Find the coldest five-day period and the warmest five-night period in each file.
• Describe in a paragraph what the hub must cope with, now and in the 2050s.

Self-critique checklist

• Have I matched the weather file to the question?
• Have I stated each file's source, period and method?
• Have I considered how the site differs from the weather station?
• Have I compared options under the same weather?