CON-230 · Lesson 12 of 12 · 34 min

Capstone: an MEP coordination and procurement plan

This capstone brings the course together in one realistic task: preparing the MEP coordination and procurement plan for a small office building, as the construction manager would at the start of construction. The plan does not redesign the systems; it organizes their delivery. It confirms the codes and authorities, closes scope gaps, schedules long-lead equipment, sets up coordination, plans inspections and commissioning, checks the budget and identifies the main risks.

Work through each step for the case project below. The answers given are one reasonable approach; on a real project, your numbers would come from the drawings, the trade contracts and supplier quotations, and every assumption would be checked with the design team.

The case project

Maple Court Offices is a three-story office building of 38,750 ft² gross floor area in a mid-sized Midwestern city, with a steel frame, composite deck slabs and a curtain wall. Floor-to-floor height is 13 ft 2 in with ceilings at 9 ft. Mechanical systems are a dedicated outdoor air unit with energy recovery on the roof, air-source VRF heat pumps for zone heating and cooling, a small gas-fired condensing boiler for perimeter radiation at the entrance, domestic hot water by heat pump water heater, and a wet sprinkler system on a combined standpipe. Electrical service is 277/480 V from a utility pad-mounted transformer, with dry-type transformers to 120/208 V, LED lighting with networked controls, a 150 kW diesel generator for life safety and a small UPS for the server room. Construction is 14 months and the building must be occupied by the end of month 14.

Step 1: confirm codes, authorities and permits

The first task is a short register of governing codes and authorities, because every later step depends on it.

Code and authority register for the case project. Editions are confirmed with each authority at project start.
SystemCode or standard to confirmAuthority and inspection
Plumbing and drainageState-adopted IPC or UPC with local amendmentsCity building department
HVAC and refrigerationIMC, ASHRAE 15, IECC or ASHRAE 90.1 as adoptedCity building department
Fuel gasIFGC or NFPA 54 as adoptedCity inspector and gas utility
ElectricalNEC edition adopted by the stateCity or state electrical inspector
Sprinklers and standpipesIBC and IFC referencing NFPA 13 and NFPA 14Fire marshal and building department
Fire alarmNFPA 72Fire marshal acceptance test

The register goes into the project manual and the inspection plan. Any difference between the edition used in design and the edition the authority enforces is raised with the design team immediately.

Step 2: close scope gaps with a responsibility matrix

MEP scope gaps cluster at interfaces between trades. A responsibility matrix lists each interface item and the trade that supplies, installs, wires and tests it.

Part of a responsibility matrix for the case project.
ItemSupplyInstallPower wiringControls and testing
VRF outdoor and indoor unitsMechanicalMechanicalElectricalMechanical with controls
DOAS unit and curbMechanicalMechanical (crane by general contractor)ElectricalControls contractor
Motor starters and drivesMechanicalElectricalElectricalControls contractor
Control power transformers and 120 V to panelsControls contractorElectricalElectricalControls contractor
Fire alarm interface relays at the DOASFire alarm vendorElectricalElectricalFire alarm vendor and commissioning
Housekeeping padsGeneral contractorGeneral contractorn/an/a
Fire stopping at MEP penetrationsEach penetrating trade (one listed system)Each penetrating traden/aThird-party inspection
Network switches and wireless access pointsOwnerOwner's IT vendorElectrical (receptacles)Owner

The matrix is checked against each subcontract's scope and attached to it, so that gaps are fixed before buyout rather than argued about later.

Step 3: check the electrical service and cooling capacity

Before long-lead orders are placed, the construction manager does a quick reasonableness check of the main capacities against benchmarks, to catch errors and confirm what the utility must supply.

Worked problem

Service size check

The engineer's load calculation gives a demand load of 288 kW at a power factor of 0.9. The owner wants 25 percent spare capacity. What service current is needed at 480 V three-phase, and what standard size is likely?

Show solution
  1. Current: 288,000 ÷ (√3 × 480 × 0.9) = 288,000 ÷ 748.3 = 385 A.
  2. With spare capacity: 385 × 1.25 = 481 A.
  3. A 600 A service at 480 V is likely; the utility application should go in at once, because transformer delivery may control the schedule.

Answer: About 481 A, so a 600 A service.

Worked problem

Cooling capacity check

The VRF and DOAS schedules total 94 tons of cooling. Benchmarks for similar offices are roughly 350 to 450 ft² per ton. Is the total reasonable for 38,750 ft²?

Show solution
  1. Benchmark range: 38,750 ÷ 450 = 86 tons to 38,750 ÷ 350 = 111 tons.
  2. 94 tons sits within the range.
  3. In kW: 94 × 3.517 = 331 kW.
  4. The capacity is plausible; no query to the engineer is needed on this point.

Answer: Yes, about 94 tons is within the benchmark range.

Step 4: build the long-lead procurement log

Each long-lead item is listed with its need date, lead time and submittal cycle, and the latest order date is worked back from the need date with a float allowance. Lead times below are illustrative and must be replaced with supplier quotations.

Illustrative long-lead procurement log. Weeks are counted from the start of construction; months are converted at about 4.3 weeks.
ItemNeed on site (month)Manufacture (weeks)Submittal cycle (weeks)Shipping (weeks)Latest order (week)
Utility transformer (utility supplied)9524 (utility application)2Application in week 1; already critical
Main switchboard82642Week 0 to 2 (pre-purchase)
Diesel generator and transfer switch103042Week 4
DOAS unit with energy recovery71642Week 4
VRF outdoor units and branch controllers71041Week 11
Fire pump (if required by flow test)82042Week 3, pending flow test

Worked problem

Working out the generator order date

The generator must be on site by month 10. Using 4.3 weeks per month, allowing 2 weeks of float, 30 weeks of manufacture, 4 weeks of submittals and 2 weeks of shipping, what is the latest order week?

Show solution
  1. Month 10 ≈ week 43.
  2. Less 2 weeks float: week 41.
  3. Less shipping: week 39.
  4. Less manufacture: week 9.
  5. Less submittals: week 5; rounding conservatively, order by week 4.

Answer: Order by about week 4.

The log shows that the utility transformer and main switchboard are already critical at the start of construction, so the plan recommends pre-purchasing the switchboard and pressing the utility for a firm delivery date. It also shows that the fire pump decision depends on a hydrant flow test, which should be done in the first two weeks.

Gantt-style timeline over 14 months showing utility application and transformer delivery, switchboard, generator, DOAS and VRF procurement, MEP coordination by floor, rough-in by floor, inspections, permanent power, start-up, testing and balancing, commissioning and occupancy.
MEP procurement and coordination timeline for the case project. Electrical gear and the utility connection control the critical path.

Step 5: plan coordination by area

The building has three floors and a roof. The plan sequences coordination one area at a time, ahead of rough-in, with sign-off at least 3 weeks before installation starts to allow shop drawings and prefabrication.

Worked problem

Coordination calendar

Rough-in starts on level 1 in week 16, level 2 in week 20, level 3 in week 24 and the roof in week 26. Coordination of each area takes 4 weeks and must finish 3 weeks before rough-in. When must coordination start for each area?

Show solution
  1. Level 1: finish by week 13, start week 9.
  2. Level 2: finish by week 17, start week 13.
  3. Level 3: finish by week 21, start week 17.
  4. Roof: finish by week 23, start week 19.
  5. Trade models must therefore be ready by week 9, which must be written into the subcontracts.

Answer: Start in weeks 9, 13, 17 and 19 respectively.

The ceiling space is tight: from the 2.7 m (9 ft) ceiling to the underside of the slab there is about 1.15 m (3 ft 9 in), with beams taking up to 0.5 m (20 in). The plan therefore routes the DOAS supply mains along the corridors, coordinates beam web openings with the structural engineer early, uses ceiling-cassette VRF units with short refrigerant runs, and sets clearance zones for VRF branch controllers and fire dampers so that maintenance access is protected.

Step 6: plan inspections, testing and commissioning

The plan lists every inspection and test as a schedule activity, with responsibilities and prerequisites.

  • Under-slab plumbing and electrical inspections before the ground floor pour.
  • Rough-in inspections floor by floor for plumbing, HVAC, sprinklers, electrical and fire alarm before ceilings close.
  • Pressure tests of water, drainage, refrigerant, gas and sprinkler piping, with records.
  • Permanent power energization, then equipment start-up by factory technicians.
  • Testing, adjusting and balancing; controls point-to-point checkout.
  • Fire alarm acceptance under NFPA 72 and sprinkler acceptance with the fire marshal.
  • Functional performance testing and an integrated power failure test with generator transfer.
  • Training, systems manual and closeout documents; seasonal testing and a warranty review in the first year.

Worked problem

Back-scheduling the final weeks

Occupancy is required at week 60. The authority needs final inspections completed 1 week before occupancy, functional testing needs 3 weeks after balancing and controls checkout, balancing and checkout need 3 weeks after start-up, and start-up needs 2 weeks after permanent power. When must permanent power be energized?

Show solution
  1. Final inspections done by week 59.
  2. Functional testing complete by week 59, starting week 56.
  3. Balancing and checkout from week 53 to week 56.
  4. Start-up from week 51 to week 53.
  5. Permanent power needed by week 51, about month 12, which confirms why the utility transformer and switchboard are critical.

Answer: By about week 51.

Step 7: check the budget and identify risks

Worked problem

MEP budget split

The construction budget is $15.5 million. Benchmarks suggest mechanical (plumbing, HVAC, fire protection and controls) at 22 percent and electrical (including low voltage) at 14 percent. What are the budgets, and what contingency should be carried at 5 percent of MEP?

Show solution
  1. Mechanical: 0.22 × 15.5 = $3.410 million.
  2. Electrical: 0.14 × 15.5 = $2.170 million.
  3. MEP total: $5.580 million (36 percent).
  4. Contingency: 0.05 × 5.580 = $0.279 million.

Answer: About $5.58 million of MEP with about $0.28 million contingency.

Finally, the plan lists the main risks, scored by likelihood and impact on a 1 to 5 scale, with an owner and a response for each.

Risk register for the case project. Score = likelihood × impact.
RiskLikelihoodImpactScoreResponse
Utility transformer delivered late4520Early application, weekly utility follow-up, temporary generator option priced
Switchboard lead time grows3515Pre-purchase, approved alternate manufacturer
Hydrant flow test requires a fire pump248Test in week 2; pre-qualify pump supplier
Ceiling space conflicts at beams339Early beam web openings, corridor routing, area sign-off
Controls programming late3412Sequences based on ASHRAE Guideline 36, checkout milestones, retainage tied to commissioning
Refrigerant rules change equipment availability236Confirm compliant refrigerant in submittals

The highest scores belong to electrical gear and the utility connection, so the plan's first actions are the utility application and the switchboard pre-purchase. The capstone deliverable is the full plan: the code register, responsibility matrix, capacity checks, procurement log, coordination calendar, inspection and commissioning schedule, budget and risk register, with assumptions clearly stated.

Common mistakes

  • MistakeStarting MEP buyout before confirming codes and authorities.

    InsteadBuild the code and authority register first; it shapes submittals, inspections and testing.

  • MistakePlacing long-lead orders without a worked-back schedule.

    InsteadCalculate latest order dates from need dates, lead times, submittals, shipping and float.

  • MistakeLeaving trade models until rough-in is near.

    InsteadWrite model delivery dates into subcontracts so coordination finishes before installation.

  • MistakeTreating commissioning as the last two weeks.

    InsteadSchedule start-up, balancing, checkout, functional testing and inspections as linked activities with real durations.

  • MistakeIgnoring the utility connection.

    InsteadApply at once; utility transformers and service upgrades often control occupancy dates.

Summary and key terms

  • An MEP coordination and procurement plan organizes delivery; it does not redesign the systems.
  • Start with a register of codes, editions, authorities and inspections.
  • A responsibility matrix closes scope gaps at trade interfaces before buyout.
  • Quick benchmark checks of service size and cooling capacity catch errors early.
  • Long-lead orders are worked back from need dates; electrical gear and the utility are often critical.
  • Coordination is sequenced by area and finished before shop drawings and rough-in.
  • Inspections, testing and commissioning are scheduled backward from occupancy, with risks scored and owned.
Coordination and procurement plan
A construction manager's plan for delivering MEP systems on time and without conflicts.
Code and authority register
A list of governing codes, editions and approving authorities for each system.
Need date
The date an item must be on site to support the schedule.
Latest order date
The last date an item can be ordered and still arrive by its need date.
Pre-purchase
Buying long-lead equipment before the main trade contract is awarded.
Benchmark check
A comparison of design quantities with typical values for similar buildings.
Coordination calendar
A schedule of coordination start and sign-off dates by area.
Integrated power failure test
A test of generator start, transfer and load restoration across systems.
Risk register
A list of risks with likelihood, impact, score, owner and response.
Contingency
An allowance in the budget for unforeseen costs.

Practice problems

Work each problem on paper first, then reveal the answer to check.

  1. What is the first document to prepare in an MEP coordination plan?

    Show answer

    The code and authority register.

  2. Why attach the responsibility matrix to subcontracts?

    Show answer

    So interface items are clearly assigned before buyout.

  3. A 250 kW load at pf 0.9 on 480 V three-phase draws how much current?

    Show answer

    About 334 A.

  4. Is 120 tons of cooling reasonable for 38,750 ft² of office?

    Show answer

    It is above the 86 to 111 ton benchmark, so ask the engineer.

  5. An item needed at week 40 has 20 weeks of manufacture, 4 of submittals, 2 of shipping and 2 of float. Latest order week?

    Show answer

    Week 12.

  6. Coordination takes 4 weeks and must finish 3 weeks before rough-in at week 30. When must it start?

    Show answer

    Week 23.

  7. Why test hydrant flow early?

    Show answer

    The result decides whether a long-lead fire pump is needed.

  8. Occupancy is week 50 and the final steps need 9 weeks after permanent power. When is power needed?

    Show answer

    Week 41.

  9. A risk has likelihood 3 and impact 4. What is its score?

    Show answer

    12.

  10. Which items usually control the critical path in this kind of project?

    Show answer

    The utility connection and main electrical gear.

Lesson quiz · 5 questions

Score 60% or more to complete this lesson.

Take the quiz